Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JamesP81
your logic is flawed because criminals will always be able to get guns and use them for unlawful activities..

you would deny guns to the very people charged with seeking out and stopping these criminals.

to my knowledge, no police officer has ever written or voted to pass a piece of legislation. hamstringing cops is no solution to the idiocy of bureaucrats.

innocent people being unable to defend themselves from criminals is another issue. let's deal with that.

45 posted on 04/30/2009 2:42:13 PM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: thefactor

No, my logic is perfectly sound. If certain firearms are so dangerous that the public shouldn’t be allowed to have them, the government doesn’t need them either for the same reason.


46 posted on 04/30/2009 2:45:56 PM PDT by JamesP81 (When Obama signed an order providing tax dollars to murder children, he stopped being my president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: thefactor; JamesP81

You said
“innocent people being unable to defend themselves from criminals is another issue. let’s deal with that.”

If microstamping adds too much to the price of firearms, then more citizens will not be able to afford to buy them. This would then cause firearm manufacturers to lose sales, and if enacted nationally, many of them could go out of business.

Stopping firearm sales to government entities in New York would put pressure on them to rescind the microstamping law (if it is enacted).


51 posted on 04/30/2009 3:39:19 PM PDT by deks (Prevent the next Ice Age ... Support Global Warming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson