Most recently, when I called him on the blatant falsehood that Rush Limbaugh "supported" Romney, he responded with the latin phrase for "Blessed are the poor in spirit." Condescending, pompous ... and cowardly. So I asked him in post 788 on this thread:
If the poor in spirit are blessed, what are the deceitful in purpose, like yourself? Because you are absolutely, deliberately deceitful in how you portray what Rush Limbaugh has said about Romney. And this time, write your response in English.
By the way, you never did respond to my post a month or so back asking you for evidence that pics of flyers and posters of Romney's appealing to homosexuals during his run for Mass Gov. were forgeries, as you implied. Can you respond to it now?
So, hey, BARNACLE CENTURION, care to respond now to these two queries with answers instead of evasions couched in Latin or deflections to another topic? The questions are both pretty straightforward:
1: If the poor in spirit are blessed, what are the deceitful in purpose?
2. What evidence or proof do you have that the photos of the pink flyer and promotional article documenting Romney's wooing of the Gay community, were forgeries?
Can you answer these straightforward questions? Or are you too cowardly a liar to come out of your cave?
How am I a liar when you are the one posting manufactured propaganda?
Can you establish a connection between Romney and those pink fliers? When and where were they given out and what was Romney’s involvement?
You can’t expect to post anti-Romney propaganda pulled from gay websites and have no one challenge them. They are obviously fake.