Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana
I heard a lot of preachers and Rabbis were worried about this bill, worried they could not preach against the FDRQ’s in their churches. Did you hear about that?

People worry about a lot of things, but there is nothing in the bill that would punish speech unless accompanied by an otherwise-criminal act.

66 posted on 04/29/2009 1:08:31 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

Yeah, but I’m sure we’d get sued for pain and suffering if we called a homo a derogatory term.


90 posted on 04/29/2009 2:35:21 PM PDT by 3catsanadog (I plan to give the new President the same respect and dignity the other side gave Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian

The law means whatever the ACLU judge says that it means. How is is going to be interpreted throughout the country especially in the moonbat enclaves? And what about judicial presedent? It only takes one moonbat judge to set a presedent.

Social issues do matter. Some people are really dense on this issue.


103 posted on 04/29/2009 4:23:29 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson