I'd bet Pelosi wishes she wouldn't have lied.
1 posted on
04/28/2009 4:40:46 PM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
The focus is figuring out how to lie with a straight face.
2 posted on
04/28/2009 4:42:36 PM PDT by
Carley
(OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
To: jazusamo
Any proof that democrats lied has been buried (or lost) by now. They always cover their a**. Hopefully Cheney made copies of EVERY THING!!
3 posted on
04/28/2009 4:43:41 PM PDT by
blueyon
(It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
To: jazusamo
PELOSI CAN’T EVEN RECOPGNIZE IF SHE’S LYING.
5 posted on
04/28/2009 4:44:42 PM PDT by
nufsed
(Release the birth certificate, school and passport records.)
To: jazusamo
I'd bet Pelosi wishes she wouldn't have lied. She is just annoyed that anyone would bring it up.
6 posted on
04/28/2009 4:46:03 PM PDT by
Dan(9698)
To: jazusamo
7 posted on
04/28/2009 4:46:05 PM PDT by
unkus
To: jazusamo
They have to coorindate their lies....
9 posted on
04/28/2009 4:46:53 PM PDT by
jersey117
To: jazusamo
I'd bet Pelosi wishes she wouldn't have lied. Me too ...
10 posted on
04/28/2009 4:47:19 PM PDT by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, your surrender your rights.)
To: jazusamo
"I'd bet Pelosi wishes she wouldn't have lied."She's spinning like a top. The latest is "they said they wouldn't do these things without telling us." I'll bet Obama also wishes his team thought the release through before pulling the trigger. It was a gift as the pudding hit the fan and splattered 'rats, particularly Pelosi...
13 posted on
04/28/2009 4:48:41 PM PDT by
eureka!
(Elections have consequences, boy howdy. *sigh*)
To: jazusamo
"The focus is about how we make the policies going forward, not about who's doing better on MSNBC"If the Dems are doing worse even on MSNBC, then they're screwed.
To: jazusamo
“The focus is about how we make the policies going forward, not about who's doing better on MSNBC,” said Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-Pa.). Democrats can't tell the truth unless it helps their agenda. Which means they lie most of the time.
15 posted on
04/28/2009 4:49:37 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
To: jazusamo
Aren’t the words ‘democrats’ and ‘intelligence’ mutually exclusive, kind of like a ‘married bachelor’?
To: jazusamo
“The focus is about how we make the policies going forward, not about who's doing better on MSNBC,” said Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-Pa.). Uh huh. The focus is how best to shield San Fran Nan from the mud we're going to throw at Bush and Cheney.
Tierney said, “Mr. Hoekstra can cross any lines that he wants. He can politicize national security if he wants to.”
Classic Democrat line - accuse other people of what you're doing yourself. And the highly selective release of the legal briefing letters - what was that?
To: jazusamo
But committee members said their meeting was about improving the nation's intelligence gathering, not responding to Republicans. Riiiiight.
The item of high national policy up for discussion? How the heck can we do show trials of Republicans on this without winding up on the griddle ourselves???
23 posted on
04/28/2009 4:59:47 PM PDT by
colorado tanker
("Lastly, I'd like to apologize for America's disproportionate response to Pearl Harbor . . . ")
To: jazusamo
Putting “intelligence” and “Pelosi” in the same sentence is just wrong.
28 posted on
04/28/2009 5:19:47 PM PDT by
nobama08
To: jazusamo
When I first saw your headline, I thought Pelosi was getting an intellectual transfusion. Then I realized you can’t revive dead brain tissue.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson