Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CDC, states: US swine flu cases jump to 68
Yahoo! News / The Associated Press ^ | April 28, 2009 | Mike Stobbe

Posted on 04/28/2009 12:00:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The number of confirmed swine flu cases in the United States has jumped to 64, federal officials said Tuesday, and states reported at least four more.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said the new count includes "a number of hospitalizations." CDC officials had previously said just one person had been hospitalized.

The CDC said there were 17 new cases in New York City, four more in Texas and three additional cases in California. That brings the total numbers of cases confirmed by federal officials to 45 in New York City, 10 in California, six in Texas, two in Kansas and one in Ohio.

State health officials in California have confirmed three other cases, and Indiana authorities have confirmed one.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Indiana; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: flu; influenza; mexicanswinflu; mexico; mexiflu; pandemic; swineflu
If they know of 68, there are 10,000+ out there.
1 posted on 04/28/2009 12:00:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; EBH; Dog Gone; ...

Ping


2 posted on 04/28/2009 12:01:39 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You got that right.

That is why the “6% mortality rate” that keeps getting restated is pure B.S. There are likely hundreds of thousands if not millions of cases in Mexico with very few deaths.

The true mortality rate is likely no higher than seasonal human influenza but the media/government would not want that truth told as it would take away their golden goose.


3 posted on 04/28/2009 12:05:42 PM PDT by tatown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatown
That is why the “6% mortality rate” that keeps getting restated is pure B.S. There are likely hundreds of thousands if not millions of cases in Mexico with very few deaths.

The "death rate" is computed as deaths divided by total cases. Except that the only cases they know about are the ones that were severe enough to require medical treatment.

4 posted on 04/28/2009 12:14:05 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tatown

If so few cases are being reported, wouldn’t the same be true of how many deaths?


5 posted on 04/28/2009 12:16:25 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tatown
That is why the “6% mortality rate” that keeps getting restated is pure B.S. There are likely hundreds of thousands if not millions of cases in Mexico with very few deaths.
The true mortality rate is likely no higher than seasonal human influenza but the media/government would not want that truth told as it would take away their golden goose.


I don't know what evidence you base your conclusions on, other than knee jerk hatred of the media. The CDC is reporting a lethality rate of between 2 and 6%, based on their scientific analysis. The Spanish Flu of 1918 had a lethality rate of 2.5%, so even if it is the low range of the CDC estimate, it is quite a nasty bug. The CDC is historically quite conservative on their lethality estimates, given that, I'd say reasonable precautions are in order. It appears to be growing exponentially in infection rates, as two days ago, there were 20 confirmed cases, and 40 yesterday, currently they are reporting something like 68 confirmed cases in the US. I don't mean to come off as someone who is saying the sky is falling, because it isn't, yet. If it does explode across the US, it will cause untold damage to the economy, aside from the actual medical effects. I'd be more worried at this point, in how many politicians, and officials with the government are repetitively asking everyone not to panic.
6 posted on 04/28/2009 12:18:28 PM PDT by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: krogers58

The CDC has NOT reported a lethality of 2% to 6%. That is a BS number that is ONLY based on the few cases that wer actually tested and confirmed in Mexico. How much testing has been done on the hundread of millions in Mexico? I’ll tell you, very little.

If you really believe that all of these people (from countries other than Mexico) are being infected while in Mexico by only 2000 infected Mexicans then you are an idiot. That would be a mathmatical IMPOSSIBILITY. Use your head!

The total number of confirmed cases (especially in Mexico) is a fraction of the number of people that have already been infected. Just look at the likely index case, his village had 450 people with the exact same symptoms as him yet he is the only person that was ‘confirmed’. BTW only 1 of the 450 died (mortality of 0.2%)...and that is in Mexico where he/she could have died from anything.


7 posted on 04/28/2009 12:26:00 PM PDT by tatown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
If so few cases are being reported, wouldn’t the same be true of how many deaths?

I don't usually go to the doctor if I get the flu. Thus, this would be unreported case.

If I ended up dying I believe my wife would probably report it.

This is how you get a higher ratio of deaths to cases than is actually the case.

8 posted on 04/28/2009 12:30:14 PM PDT by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Which would be easier to account for?
A - Mild symtoms that could be any number of normal human infections.
B - Dead bodies.

The answer is clearly B. Most people with mild symptoms wouldn’t even seek medical assistance, thus there would be NO account for them having been infected in the first place.


9 posted on 04/28/2009 12:31:26 PM PDT by tatown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tatown

It’s not so much the mortality rate of this flu - it’s who is dying of this flu. It’s healthy young and middle aged people, not the typical people who die of the regular flu (i.e., elderly and very young)... just something to keep in mind.


10 posted on 04/28/2009 12:35:39 PM PDT by California74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: California74

Those that have died are from third world sh#thole and we have NO idea what the contributing factors were. That needs to be considered as well.


11 posted on 04/28/2009 12:39:20 PM PDT by tatown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tatown

Absolutely. I agree with you there, too.


12 posted on 04/28/2009 12:41:57 PM PDT by California74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: California74
It’s not so much the mortality rate of this flu - it’s who is dying of this flu.

How many people die from the variety of ordinary flu strains in the US each year? 33,000? Divided by 365, that's about 90 per day. The total death toll from this so-called crisis is zero.

13 posted on 04/28/2009 1:04:15 PM PDT by meyer (Obama is to the USA as Mugabe is to Zimbabwe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tatown

100’s of Millions??time?? 111 Million estimated by July 2009 https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mx.html


14 posted on 04/28/2009 1:08:47 PM PDT by philly-d-kidder (May the good saints protect you & bless you today & may troubles ignore you Each step of the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Again, the panic isn’t over the number of dead, it’s over who is dying and how. Otherwise healthy young adults are dying directly from this flu strain via a cytokine storm. The CDC stats count “influenza/pneumonia related deaths” not necessarily who has died directly from the flu.

Our bodies simply don’t know how to fight this as opposed to the “miss 2 days of work” flu we usually get.


15 posted on 04/28/2009 2:23:19 PM PDT by BJClinton (One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton
Again, the panic isn’t over the number of dead, it’s over who is dying and how.

And my point is that in the United States, NOBODY is dying from the so-called swine flu. It appears to me that the left is trying to induce a panic over nothing. They have a reason, and that reason is not their concern about our health.

16 posted on 04/28/2009 2:30:18 PM PDT by meyer (Obama is to the USA as Mugabe is to Zimbabwe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson