[mick]

No. I didn't ignore the evidence. I tried to place the evidence you presented into context. I said I couldn't support the positions you mentioned.

But like Al B said, she was following the party ( MAC ) line.

And I tried to bring in RR to also lend a little perspective into the argument. No one expects to agree on every issue. But there are Big issues and Small issues. You are nit picking on what I consider small issues. Maybe they are Big issues to you. That's fine. But you are not giving us your criteria. I did.

I gave you the issues I consider critical for conservatives. If you show me where she has been in violation of those :ie: Individual Liberty,Small Government, and Free Enterprise.....AS HER OWN POSITIONS AND NOT PART OF HER LOYALTY TO THE TICKET IN 2008, then maybe you can make the claim that she is a potential Bush redux.

Otherwise, I think simple fairness requires you to hold your fire until she is out on her own running for President.

[donna]

Bush redux.