Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski; Pete
The CDC levels and plans do not account for a widespread event with low lethality, which appears to be what we are dealing with here.

The use of physical restrictions on travel was designed for (and would be appropriate for) smallpox.

It's not appropriate for sniffles.

63 posted on 04/28/2009 12:10:51 PM PDT by Jim Noble (They are willing to kill for socialism...but not to die for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

The call I mentioned above is actually by FEMA legal councel. They are going through a powerpoint deck. Slide 53 is titled “Quarantine and Isolation Law: The Basics”. Again, anyone can call and listen in.


64 posted on 04/28/2009 12:13:38 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
Slide 71

Federal Powers: Quarantine and Isolation

The Secretary of HHS (through CDC) can: “detain, medically examine, or conditionally release” persons suspected of carrying certain communicable diseases

Authority applies only if communicable disease has been designated in a Presidential Executive Order SARS added 2003 Avian influenza added 2005

66 posted on 04/28/2009 12:15:39 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
slide 69 is a real gem (bold added by me):

State and Local Jurisdictional Issues Regarding Protection of People

Remember: Police powers, including public health authority, are reserved to states under the U.S. Constitution’s 10th Amendment

But: federal and international jurisdictional issues may arise in a given case

67 posted on 04/28/2009 12:18:00 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson