Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/27/2009 8:25:03 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY

That’s mighty white of them


2 posted on 04/27/2009 8:26:06 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

The only got a clue because they got caught.

They only got caught because they were so dang stupid.


3 posted on 04/27/2009 8:26:23 PM PDT by Winstons Julia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Greta was REALLY steamed about this! Aside from scaring people to death, she was pushing the DC reporter to ask Obama how much this little stunt cost the taxpayers. I loved her comment that for $300 they could have bought Photoshop and faked up a pic of AF1 over the NY Skyline and avoided all this cost and hassle.


4 posted on 04/27/2009 8:27:18 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Will the media ever actually report what I suspect...that this was campaign video for Obama 2012?


5 posted on 04/27/2009 8:27:58 PM PDT by FreepShop1 (www.FreepShop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

What a cluster event. And how typical of our Overlords.


7 posted on 04/27/2009 8:30:28 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
About all I have to say about this regime's most recent screwup is that, watching that tape today gave me the chills.

Of course, unlike the little Obamacorns, I'm old enough to remember 09-11-01.

9 posted on 04/27/2009 8:33:35 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Proud charter member of Napolitano's rightwing, nutcase American, watch list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Breaking News:

In light of today's panic, the 0bama administration has scrubbed plans for a photo shoot in Oklahoma City using Ryder rental trucks in front of federal buildings.

11 posted on 04/27/2009 8:35:23 PM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

thats a bit late... they should harshly prosecute those involved


12 posted on 04/27/2009 8:35:52 PM PDT by GeronL (TYRANNY SENTINEL. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com LIBERTY FICTION at libertyfic.proboards.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

He screwed up again , then jumped into panic mode and banned all flights.

Where I am from they call that locking the barn after the horse escaped.

This guy hasnt got a clue, and it seems he has surrounded himself with others just as bad.


14 posted on 04/27/2009 8:36:23 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

“The official had no details on future flights but said any such plans are now irrelevant.”

IRRELEVANT?

Boy..the WH is really hoping this goes away and and fast. They want the whole story to be irrelevant. No doubt the media will comply. Already the Obama Acorn thugs are hitting the internet comment sections of every major media story about this terror stunt. Earlier today, no such people were populating the blogs. People were mad as hell and saying so on every news site and popular blog.

The Obama brownshirts must have gotten their marching orders to downplay the incident tonight. They are out in force the last hour or so.


15 posted on 04/27/2009 8:37:37 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Did Bush do these photo ops with Air Force One?


17 posted on 04/27/2009 8:39:46 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
I was just in a cab where the little TV was playing MSNBC...the news scroll on the bottom read--Low flying jets scare New Yorkers. Uh, no...Air Force One photo op scares New Yorkers.
19 posted on 04/27/2009 8:40:36 PM PDT by Miss Didi ( "After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY; El Gato; Doogle
Hit your Zoomie lists, El Gato and Doogle and find some aviators (sorry, pilots), techs or crews that can enlighten the uninformed public about the President's new toys. Air Force One was never designed to be a prop in Obama's 100 Day Self Gratification.
20 posted on 04/27/2009 8:41:39 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Typical Obama barn-door approach:
“Let’s not do THAT again!”

No principles, no morality, just a fear of getting caught.
Although the fear of looking stupid apparently means nothing to them...


24 posted on 04/27/2009 8:48:06 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

You mean to tell me that not a single dipstick on the WH publicity staff ever heard of Photo Shop?


25 posted on 04/27/2009 8:49:11 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Wouldn’t we love to know who was on that plane. Maybe Obama was doing a dry run.


28 posted on 04/27/2009 8:53:24 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Someone needs to find out what variant F-16's flew today? Did a singleseater pilot really take pictures out of a tinted canopy while buzzing NYC in close proximity to other aircraft?

Someone should also find out the names of any civilians aboard AF1.


30 posted on 04/27/2009 8:54:26 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002331----000-.html

Updates to this section of the United States Code

Title 18 > Part I > Chapter 113B > Section 2331

§ 2331. Definitions

Title 18 of the US Code as currently published by the US Government reflects the laws passed by Congress as of Jan. 3, 2007, and it is this version that is published here.


TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > § 2331
Prev | Next
§ 2331. Definitions
How Current is This?
As used in this chapter—
(1) the term “international terrorism” means activities that—
(A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum;
(2) the term “national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;
(3) the term “person” means any individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property;
(4) the term “act of war” means any act occurring in the course of—
(A) declared war;
(B) armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or
(C) armed conflict between military forces of any origin; and
(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.


So the question remains, will the US Supreme Court dare clarify if this event was international, or domestic, terrorism? In the Hudson River flight path and part of the East River flight path, EVERY single jurisdiction has the ability and preponderance of evidence to sit a grand jury and indict the director of the White House military office, Louis Caldera, and a good amount of the staff both civilian and military operating under his authority during the preparatino of this terrorist attack. Every single individual affected by this has civil class action suit standing against this administration. And let's not try to guess the number, but over 20 buildings were evacuated, including the large Goldman Sachs complex and the 55 story condo which is the tallest building in Jersey City, NJ. There are still thousands and thousands of people in that area still these several years later, under psychological counseling due the the fateful events on 9/11.

(On a personal note my heart just sunk today when it first crossed the newswire, out and out panic. Not again, not again, not again. Living in the NYC burbs I immediately started a run down list of every one I know who works in Manhattan and JC, I never want to have to do that again.)

The panic of Goldman Sachs complex highrise evacuees in Jersey City:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jn0tMMYEkQU

The panic in Brooklyn:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxE0iazfIBg

The minimum altitude and military escort:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMoy8JprKI0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H_8kQoVVFg



31 posted on 04/27/2009 8:57:17 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

maverick and goose are not going to be happy about this.


32 posted on 04/27/2009 8:59:08 PM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Fishy, fishy story ... who wanted a ‘fly-over photo op’ and why? That is just a weird explanation.

Was this some sort of security training session?

If not, who order the mission and to what purpose. Photo-op, I think not ....


33 posted on 04/27/2009 8:59:22 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson