Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Finny; LachlanMinnesota
No, fighter jets (from what I'm told by someone who has flown in them and worked on them)...

I'll tell you what, I'll put my 28 years in the USAF (4 with F-16s) and personal work with Combat Camera folks against your knowledgeable "someone" any day.

An Air Force combat photographer took pictures from one of the fighter jets, administration officials said.

350 posted on 04/28/2009 3:09:29 AM PDT by TankerKC (01/20/09 = 09/10/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]


To: TankerKC; LachlanMinnesota
Tank, I'll take your word for it that photos can be taken from F-16s. I stand corrected and enlightened. Your experience certainly trumps my "someone"'s!

However, I must reject the "official" word that this event was a "photo op." My common sense has been too reliable a guide over the years for me ignore it now. There was no reason to keep this thing secret and unannounced -- on the contrary, notifying the NYC public that it was scheduled could easily have been a wonderful PR thing for Obama. From the camera standpoint, I've only see one F-16 in the photos and videos, and it is always flying either closely beside or directly behind, AF1; the other F-16 isn't evident, and you'd think it would be if the idea was to get pics of AF1 with Lady Liberty and the NYC skyline. Neither one of the F-16s, from film I've seen, were in locations that made sense for photography. But I admit that I don't know or haven't seen where the other one was during the event.

No, the most dubious factor is the secrecy thing. Supposedly NYC officials were notified well in advance and told to keep it under their hats, and in that time, not a peep leaked out, not even a rumor, of it happening. WHY? For a dramatic, clearly potentially traumantic event, timed at the height of workday scheduling on a Monday morning??? Puh-leeeze.

Why the secrecy, when making it public to an Obama-adoring NYC populace, the reassuring prospect of this time our SAFE and FRIENDLY President's plane in the city, for a very reasonable, legit, and non-partisan purpose (not even Republicans could object, and I certainly wouldn't) purpose of getting nice updated stock photos of the plane with the city in the background.

This wasn't a photo op, and it defies common sense to think it was. It was either a) a secret operation with "photo op" as the cover story to be announced after the fact because announcing it ahead of time would have sabotaged the operation, OR b) a rogue event by who knows who, for who knows what purpose -- but something no one knew about in advance, not Obama, not the DOD, nor NYC officials. In a desperate and hasty cover-our-ass response, the "photo op" cover was used and NYC officials were either forced or convinced to claim that they were notified in advance.

If this was a legit "photo op" simply bungled by a narcissitic administration or negligent DOD, then Michelle Obama really has blue eyes and freckles underneath that dark tan and brown contact lenses.

363 posted on 04/28/2009 8:59:11 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson