[publiusF27]

And what is stopping liberal court to rule that the home will be the only place not considered "sensitive"?

The same thing that is stopping a Constitutional Convention from being called to rescind the 2nd amendment, I suppose. But in your post number 5, you said we have already reached the point where the home is the only protected place, and we have not. You said:

The 9th decided that as long as a law does not restrict your ability to posess and defend your home with a firearm, it is not unconstitutional.

They did not say that. They said that the county could restrict guns in sensitive places, and went on to say that a fairgrounds is such a place, but also questioned whether a parking lot is such a place. Questioning whether a parking lot is a "sensitive place" is a long way from saying that the home is the only place that is not sensitive.

[Erik Latranyi]

Questioning whether a parking lot is a "sensitive place" is a long way from saying that the home is the only place that is not sensitive.

I am not going to argue with someone on my side over semantics.

My point is that you can see where the liberal courts are taking this and while we are not there yet, the stage is being set.