[metmom]

But on March 24, after interviewing one of the MIT professors who conducted the study on which the GOP relied to produce its estimate, the St. Petersburg Times fact-check unit, Politifact, declared the GOP figure of $3,100 per household was a "Pants on Fire" falsehood. The GOP claim is "just wrong," MIT professor John Reilly told Politifact. "It's wrong in so many ways it's hard to begin."

I'm sure it's wrong, too. It's probably too low.

[Gilbo_3]

I'm sure it's wrong, too. It's probably too low

put any number on it, still wont reduce the emissions that will still be allowed, they will just have to be bought and sold...

the rest of the dirtiest polluters will remain, and until the sun decided to change its cycle we'll warm or cool as it sees fit...

[HangThemHigh]

"I'm sure it's wrong, too. It's probably too low."

I humbly disagree. I think the economy will collapse (the rest of the way) under the weight of this thing and nobody will have $3000. Then the government can pay us all to sit around and do nothing by printing more money.