Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AdmSmith
Thank you for the comment, but according to Reid, etc., published in Journal of Virology, Vol. 78, 12462-12470, in 2004, the 1918 Spanish Flu virus is more related to swine flu than Avian flu, based on the sample from Brevig Mission, Alaska.

Here is the paper

And here is the a picture of the phylogenetic tree: Larger version here Larger version here

Am still working on finding the new sequence.
282 posted on 04/25/2009 12:57:42 PM PDT by FreedomFighter1013 (Obama is Weakening America for Partisan Gain: Change, Big-Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomFighter1013

Yes, according to that article it seems that it is more related to the Swine subtype than to the Avian subtype. But that is not the general view, see for instance http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol12no01/05-0979.htm

It was probably multiple reassortment events that produced that virus.


286 posted on 04/25/2009 1:26:01 PM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomFighter1013

There was a discussion about this on PFI (Pandemic Flu Information Forum) the owner’s screen name is Monotreme, he’s some sort of scientist (I am NOT!!!) and he stated yesterday in answer to a question that newer info has determined that the 1918 flu was directly from avian, no swine. But I haven’t a clue, just trying to read and learn.


302 posted on 04/25/2009 5:24:51 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Aham Brahmasmi - I am eternal soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson