She sez she was told the technique ‘could’ be used; not that it ‘would’ be used.
Seems to me the time to pitch a fit ‘would’ be when she was told the technique ‘could’ be used. Why, other than for political ammo, would a principled elected official even allow the possibility of an action that he/she believes to be wrong?
As usual, Pelousy’s intentions are suspect, and her explanation rings hollow.
It’s time to take back the country.
It all depends on what the meaning of “is” is
I don’t “suspect”, I know she’s a W.....! This calls for revolutionary action.
I don’t “suspect”, I know she’s a W.....! This calls for revolutionary action.
we were warned that there “could” be a housing crash (Fannie,Freddie etc....), not that there “would” be a housing crash. Sounds kina preposterous doesn’t it Nancy.
Is anyone else getting tired of the “leaders” in Congress not connecting any dots? ‘we only authorized the threat of war, not an actual war’...............