Posted on 04/22/2009 10:25:11 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Hard to believe that some people are so narcissistic that they would go to these lengths to have a child instead of just adopting one of the hundreds of thousands of children already born and waiting for families.
Not arguing anything, just seeking opinion. It is a simple question, actually. If life begins at conception, and there is no conception, is it life? If this irritates you, I am sorry. But perhaps I am the canary in the coal mine. The question is not going to go away. There have to be many, many folks asking the same question, and the church is going to have to answer, eventually. Maybe not today, or tomorrow, but it is not going away.
I believe in God with all my heart. Peace.
I pointed out how 2 fetus can grow from 1 “conception”. You skated around my evidence and the original question about twins.
I concede that twins are human, and two different and sacred souls. No problem there. God bless them.
But what about cloned people? No conception at all. What is your opinion as to their souls and is it possible to have a soul without conception? Not being a contrarian, just wondering, and don’t know what to think.
So I am just asking you and everyone, if there is no conception, is the person, well, human? Is there a soul? Yes or no?
From where comes the soul of the twin who splits off the child conceived through “conception”? You are hung up on a word. Does the soul also divide when the second embryo splits off?
Nailed it. It's not "what can I do," but "what should I do."
Is that a yes or no?
At the moment of creation, it becomes a unique being. That being can be subdivided but that becomes the creation of something new. The old still remains.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.