Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Delacon
While I am no fan of the 14th amendment, there are rights that are guaranteed us through the constitution that states can not abridge.

Until the 14th amendment, this was not true. As soon as you accept incorporation, federalism/states rights goes out the window. Hell, without incorporation, the Feds would have no way to create rights--like, for example, a right to abortion. They'd have no say in, for example, religion in schools, etc. Like I said, it's done more harm than good. We'd be better off fighting for our rights at the state level.

21 posted on 04/21/2009 6:17:16 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

“Until the 14th amendment, this was not true. As soon as you accept incorporation, federalism/states rights goes out the window”.

Then why did the framers feel the 10th amendment was necessary? Specific powers of the federal government were granted to it over the states. Why else would the framers feel the need to grant “all the other powers” to the states and the people?


22 posted on 04/21/2009 6:32:25 AM PDT by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson