Skip to comments.
Obama, Congress Poised to End Tax-Free Internet Shopping
http://www.butasforme.com/2009/04/20/obama-and-congress-poised-to-end-tax-free-internet-shopping/ ^
| 04/20/2009
| BAFM
Posted on 04/20/2009 8:56:03 AM PDT by wrrock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
1
posted on
04/20/2009 8:56:03 AM PDT
by
wrrock
To: wrrock
They intend to end all tax free human activity.
2
posted on
04/20/2009 8:58:31 AM PDT
by
Williams
(It's The Policies, Stupid.)
To: wrrock
We warned about this when they started, retroactively, collecting state tax on internet tobacco purchases.
No one listened then.
The government will take a mile if they are given an inch.
3
posted on
04/20/2009 8:58:58 AM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: wrrock
Since when did the federal government have the right to tell states what to tax?
4
posted on
04/20/2009 8:59:01 AM PDT
by
wk4bush2004
(SARAH PALIN, 2012!!!!!!!)
To: wk4bush2004
We ordered an item from Home Depot over the weekend. Their website states that law obligates them to charge tax.
We won’t be ordering from THEM any longer.
5
posted on
04/20/2009 9:01:12 AM PDT
by
yobid
(2012 can not get here soon enough)
To: wk4bush2004
6
posted on
04/20/2009 9:01:46 AM PDT
by
cvq3842
To: wk4bush2004
Oooo! Ooo! I know! I know! Pick me!
January 20th, 2009?
7
posted on
04/20/2009 9:01:56 AM PDT
by
YoungHickey
("Those who say it can't be done should not interupt those doing it.")
To: wk4bush2004
This is interstate commerce, and if they structured it right, they could make this turd Constitutional. However, how the hell is an internet retailer going to keep track of ALL tax jurisdictions in the United States?
Look at how many jurisdictions are in existence just in New York State!
NY PUB-718: New York State Sales and Use Tax Rates by Jurisdiction
8
posted on
04/20/2009 9:02:05 AM PDT
by
Dan Nunn
(Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise. -The Great One)
To: wk4bush2004
Since when did the federal government have the right to tell states what to tax? January 21, 2009
9
posted on
04/20/2009 9:02:05 AM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(Clinton was our first black President ... Obama is our first French President.)
To: wrrock
I guess this will not hurt/apply to those making less then 250000 dollars (sarc)
10
posted on
04/20/2009 9:02:31 AM PDT
by
italianquaker
( Something stinks in DC, oh it is just B.O)
To: Dan Nunn
“Look at how many jurisdictions are in existence just in New York State!”
OMG!!!!!!! No wonder New York is so messed up!
11
posted on
04/20/2009 9:03:54 AM PDT
by
wk4bush2004
(SARAH PALIN, 2012!!!!!!!)
To: wrrock
Hasn’t something like this been tried ever since internet shopping became popular? Seems like it pops up every couple of years or so.
12
posted on
04/20/2009 9:04:06 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
To: yobid
Home Depot has for a long time had to charge tax, because they have physical facilities (i.e. stores) in all 50 states. This bill will force companies that have never set foot in a particular state to start collecting taxes for them. Not a surprise as this has been nearly as high on the Dimocrat wish-list as Card Check for a very long time.
But just remember....Obama won’t raise one penny of taxes on anyone making under $75K....oy vey!
To: yobid
We ordered an item from Home Depot over the weekend. Their website states that law obligates them to charge tax. This has been the case for some time. If there's a "brick and mortar" store in your state, on-line sales require a sales tax.
14
posted on
04/20/2009 9:08:05 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: wrrock
The timing is perfect for this tax. It will help fund the criminal class and also usher in a speedy economic recovery.//sarcasm off//
15
posted on
04/20/2009 9:08:22 AM PDT
by
mosaicwolf
(Strength and Honor)
To: Dan Nunn
IOW buying from OUTSIDE the united state will INCrEASE.
Tech retailers will simply set up offshore internet storefronts.
This is just as much about killing ecconomic growth.
16
posted on
04/20/2009 9:08:30 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: rhombus; Buckeye McFrog
If there's a "brick and mortar" store in your state, on-line sales require a sales tax. Absolutely correct. New York, on the cutting edge of finding ways to tax its citizens, recently passed a law (upheld by the state Supreme Court) that characterizes "affiliates" (independent people who may operate a storefront on Amazon or post links to Amazon to which they get paid referral money) as a presence inside New York State, and therefore subjects them to state taxation.
It's been termed the Amazon Tax because it applies most famously to Amazon.com.
17
posted on
04/20/2009 9:11:47 AM PDT
by
Dan Nunn
(Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise. -The Great One)
To: wrrock
What's the over/under on Amazon.com moving to Switzerland?
|
18
posted on
04/20/2009 9:11:48 AM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(I am Obama of Borg. Allegiance is futile. You will be capitulated.)
To: wk4bush2004
Since when did the federal government have the right to tell states what to tax?The States have been 'pushing' the Feds for this.
19
posted on
04/20/2009 9:12:15 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
To: wrrock
What loophole are they talking about?
The law now allows this, so it is not a loophole.
20
posted on
04/20/2009 9:13:30 AM PDT
by
DMG2FUN
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson