To: editor-surveyor; metmom; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; GourmetDan; MrB; valkyry1; DaveLoneRanger; ...
To: GodGunsGuts
Darwin was a Christian not an atheist, Its you creationists that claim he was an atheist (with all scientists) and then claim he contradicts himself by having God based principles. Unfortunately to those that only read creationist sources like this, they see no contradiction because all they know is your straw man.
3 posted on
04/19/2009 8:56:04 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(RNC Party Theme : "We may be socialists, but they are Marxists!")
To: GodGunsGuts
“If this world were nothing but a cosmic accident, if our brains were nothing but rearranged pond scum, then why would they be able to understand the universe?”
Most people fit into the “rearranged pond scum” category, don’t they? I mean, who just got elected president of the U.S.?
You’d think that an all-knowing, omnipotent god would do better.
To: GodGunsGuts
13 posted on
04/19/2009 10:56:14 AM PDT by
Glenn
(Free Venezuela!)
To: GodGunsGuts
To do science, certain things must be true. The universe must be logical and have some organization to it. Moreover, the human mind must be capable of rational thoughtcapable of considering the various alternatives and then choosing the best. But if evolution were true, then we would have no reason to expect either of these conditions. What? Young earth creationists argue constantly that the "assumption of uniformity" is precisely where "evolutionists" go awry. Until today, I guess.
19 posted on
04/20/2009 7:17:47 AM PDT by
atlaw
To: GodGunsGuts
YECers continually start with the premise that evolution requires ‘something from nothing’. That is simply not true.
23 posted on
04/21/2009 7:54:02 AM PDT by
Soothesayer
(The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson