To: Crazieman; Zakeet
You said, Crazieman — And this is why you dont have female soldiers.
—
Or, at least *shouldn’t* have female soldiers. I think it’s probably okay for “other than combat” situations, but in combat situations, it seems that because of the intense associated danger that sexual assaults increase in that kind of environment.
To: Star Traveler
That’s ok, bill maher just made a joke about our soldiers and rape so it’s no big deal, what’s the left going to do about it.
11 posted on
04/18/2009 8:26:44 AM PDT by
longfellow
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
To: Star Traveler
Would’nt “combat” by nature mean you are too busy fighting for sexual issues?
14 posted on
04/18/2009 8:27:11 AM PDT by
edcoil
(Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for dinner Liberty is a well-armed lamb)
To: Star Traveler
Or, at least *shouldnt* have female soldiers. I think its probably okay for other than combat situations, but in combat situations, it seems that because of the intense associated danger that sexual assaults increase in that kind of environment. *******************
You accept that our military men would behave as the author claims?
I don't.
17 posted on
04/18/2009 8:28:32 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Star Traveler
I think its probably okay for other than combat situations, but in combat situations, it seems that because of the intense associated danger that sexual assaults increase in that kind of environment. And I suppose the same could be said of females in those situations. Maybe some are a little more inclined to see sexual harassment towards them where none was intended?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson