Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trisham

You have to be able to report “facts” and take them as something that is happening (especially if it pertains to these women being raped...) — and, at the same time — *not* have it being “anti-military*.

All that does — when you say it’s “anti-military” is contribute to covering up something that is happening to these women. And I don’t think that it’s right for these women in those cases...


153 posted on 04/18/2009 4:33:18 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler
All that does — when you say it’s “anti-military” is contribute to covering up something that is happening to these women. And I don’t think that it’s right for these women in those cases...

****************

Disputing the "facts" is not "covering" it up. Sorry, but imho, a reasonable person reading the entirety of your posts would not see them as showing concern for women. A reasonable person would see an anti-military agenda.

155 posted on 04/18/2009 4:36:44 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson