[He Rides A White Horse]

Sexual, genetic and biological defectives, are calling natural born humans “evil spawn”???

There is no evidence that they are the result of some genetic or biological cause. Despite many efforts on their side to prove such.

They desperately seek biological reasons; if it were so, then they can claim a 'natural' diversion from evolution.

The only thing ever proved is that it is a choice.

[DGHoodini]

Their sexual appetites are all the proof needed. They eschew the biological imperative in their desired preferences. Their motives contradict genetic logial progression, and their sexual actions are those of the narcissist with abnormal self gratification gained through bodily abuse of their sex partners. They are sexual defectives, by nature or nurture.it doesn’t matter. By practice, they do what is animalistic and bestial in nature. *Not* what is of the human nature. They are devolved/ing from what makes one human.

[Lucky Dog]

The only thing ever proved is that it is a choice.

Unless it is a disease, it doesn’t matter whether homosexual behavior is genetic or not. Below is a little tidbit of reasoning to bolster your case:

Homosexuality is defined practically by behavior, i.e., unless one engages in sexual activity with a member of the same sex, he, or she, is not a homosexual.

Contrary to popular opinion, the term sexual orientation, an expression based exclusively on “feelings,” does not practically define anyone as a homosexual. To contend that only “feelings” can categorically define a person is to maintain that “feelings of “lust” define one as a rapist or “feelings” of “anger” define one as a murderer or “feelings” of “greed” define one as a thief.

“Feelings” are phenomena completely internal to their possessor(s). No human can know any other human's "feelings" without that other human engaging in some behavior from which those "feelings" can be inferred. Therefore, outside of mental health terms, defining a classification identifier, i.e., homosexual, based exclusively on a human's "feelings" makes the term practically meaningless.

Any human behavior (not driven by autonomic or instinctual responses) that is not voluntary is, by definition, a psychosis.

Therefore, homosexual behavior is either a voluntary choice or a psychosis.

If homosexual behavior is a psychosis, then it is validly subject to treatment and possible cure. Consequently, like other psychoses, its sufferers should be given curative therapy whenever possible.

If homosexual behavior is a voluntary choice, then it is/should be subject to the same types of societal behavioral regulations/norms/laws as is any other sexual behavior such as pedophilia, pederasty, prostitution, polygamy, polyandry, etc.