Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

sperm burpin' gutter slut


1 posted on 04/16/2009 10:58:14 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: pissant
“Come now, you’ve never read an actuarial table in your life, have you?”

2 posted on 04/16/2009 11:05:10 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

how much debt do we need anyway?


3 posted on 04/16/2009 11:17:31 PM PDT by GeronL (TYRANNY SENTINEL. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Barney Frank’s track record as a financial analyst is, shall we say, mixed. The House Financial Services Chairman said for years that a collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would pose zero risk to taxpayers,well that dodn’t work out to good and he isn’t jail yet?


4 posted on 04/17/2009 2:33:18 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
The government can charge low premiums without putting taxpayers on the hook, he argues, because the risk of default is so low.

Yes, its low until it's not. Anyone remember Orange County? Or how about WOOPs Bonds?

Paying a higher rate is the market's way of punishing an entity for its own mismangement and bad decisions. Once again, we'll have the gov't rewarding failure.

What's wrong with this picture?

5 posted on 04/17/2009 3:51:19 AM PDT by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Idiot. Insurance would mean the granting of a put to the bondholders, making the bonds effectively riskless. Like other options, it has value because of the possibility it will be paid off. It costs money!

Further, making municipal bonds riskless will effectively remove a major restraint on borrowing, because lenders won’t have to worry about default. It will be Freddie/Fannie all over again, only worse, without oversight, and bigger.

It should also be noted that municipalities are most likely to have problems when a systemic economic event (e.g., severe recession) occurs. That means that when the payoffs become necessary, they will be huge, and come at just the time when the government is short of money (unless it prints it).

What a dangerous, incompetent, nutty jerk!


6 posted on 04/17/2009 4:39:31 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson