Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zaphod3000; Vaquero
It could be that the reason fatality stats are significantly different only in the states that changed the age voluntarily is that those states actually ramped up enforcement, whereas the others just changed their laws to pay lip service to the feds and keep their federal money, but did nothing additional on enforcement.

That said, I agree 100% with Vaquero and others here that if you're old enough to serve and old enough to vote, you're old enough to do other legal adult things, too.

34 posted on 04/16/2009 2:40:18 PM PDT by Emile ("If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything" -- Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Emile

“It could be that the reason fatality stats are significantly different only in the states that changed the age voluntarily is that those states actually ramped up enforcement, whereas the others just changed their laws to pay lip service to the feds and keep their federal money, but did nothing additional on enforcement.”

In addition, it’s more likely that states with “a problem” ie. high rates of <21 alcohol-related deaths were the most likely to adopt stricter laws. Once that approach was extended to states with much smaller problems (e.g., I’m guessing alcohol-related deaths in Utah are much lower due to cultural reasons), those states saw little or no improvement in their already-low fatality rates.

One size does not fit all. Maybe we should pass a law forcing all policymakers to learn this basic fact.


38 posted on 04/16/2009 2:57:42 PM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson