Ok, this is the one and only graph in , pray tell, where is the data to back up those data points on Darwood's so-called "Tree of Life"???
==Making stuff up doesn't really do much to support your argument
See also:
Darwinism Must Die So That Evolution May Live - NYTimes.com
See also:
And now that the have discovered that the genome is at least 93% functional (as opposed 97% "junk" as the Evos predicted), that is going to throw all the Evo's phylogenetic trees that supposedly show common ancestry into complete disarray. Indeed, that is one of the reasons the Evos themselves are finally being forced to cut down darwood's tree (just as creationists have been predicting all along). LOL!!!