Replies

Not at all. Actually you danced with the rate and why, not the how; again, reading really is fundamental and would do you a world of good.

Actually, again, reading and understanding go hand in hand.

You can read all you want (an I'm quite sure that your reading list is very limited) but without understanding that is just wasted time.

Meanwhile, virtually any book on evolution will cover the answer to your question (regarding intelligence) in the detail you require if, of course, you are capable of understanding.

My money is on not. You've proven nothing but just how helpless you are, in some 230+ posts.

And you've read all of those, have you? If you had and still called me liberal I'd think you dumber than I already do. . .

Again, I'm going with not.

I didn't think so.

Another debunked liberal myth. Of course evolution is completely dependent on origins, which is why Darwin called his book ORIGIN of species.

Debunked by whom? A motley crew of holy rollers hell-bent on "proving" their favorite work of fiction?

All we have here is more proof of your failure to understand.

Sure evolution depends, by nature, on the existence of life, but the two processes are separate. Once life came into being evolution is sufficient to define how the various species came into being (hence: Origin of the Species - gotta read the whole title, not "epic fail" on the first word.)