[Filo]

So you ascribe to the supposition that "Man is the measure of all things."

Not man. Intelligence.

Another intelligent species, if we knew one, would reach the same conclusions we did about evolution because they would follow the facts.

The rest of your nonsense is just that and deserves no response.

[hosepipe]

[ The rest of your nonsense is just that and deserves no response. ]

Uh Oh!... hes doing the backstoke..

[betty boop]

The rest of your nonsense is just that and deserves no response.

It's not "nonsense," simply something that (clearly) you do not understand.

If I were you, I'd stop parading my ignorance.... (Jeepers, I'd give the same advice to Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, Richard Lewontin, Stephen Pinker, Jacques Monod, and a litany of other prominent scientists; so please don't think I'm singling you out for special treatment.)

Oh, and by the way, where did "intelligence" come from? Clever matter in its (random) motions???

Just for the fun of it, try to explain how intelligence could arise from a random cause.

[metmom]

Another intelligent species, if we knew one, would reach the same conclusions we did about evolution because they would follow the facts.

Mankind can't even agree on evolution. And you think that another species would come to the same conclusion about evolution that you hold?

Thanks. I needed a good laugh today.