[metmom]

Can you describe the naturalistic process that resulted in the creation of the laws of physics by which nature operates?

Clearly some great sky being waved his hands and created them.

Duh!

(May you be touched by his Noodly Appendage)

If we're asking stupid origins questions how about this one: Who created God*?

***********************************************************

What a total COP-OUT of an answer!!!!

As my daughter likes to say..... EPIC FAIL.

That is not a *stupid origins* question. Evos like to pretend that they have all the answers, but when someone asks them something they can't answer, they resort to this, the usual disparagement and mockery and subject changing strawman.

Science depends on those laws. Without them science would not exist. Evos claim that everything has naturalistic explanations. So explain.

For that matter, thank you for admitting that the *Who created God* comeback is stupid. We always thought so. You've confirmed it.

[count-your-change]

“Clearly some great sky being waved his hands and created them.”

If The Temple of Darwinism can’t do science it can do sarcasm.

[tpanther]

That is not a *stupid origins* question. Evos like to pretend that they have all the answers, but when someone asks them something they can't answer, they resort to this, the usual disparagement and mockery and subject changing strawman.

Well metmom, you do have to remember you're dealing with people that truly consider themselves soulless great apes.

[Filo]

What a total COP-OUT of an answer!!!!

My point exactly. Whenever you invoke some imaginary creator you aren't really answering anything.

That is not a *stupid origins* question.

Yes, it very much is.

Evos like to pretend that they have all the answers, but when someone asks them something they can't answer, they resort to this, the usual disparagement and mockery and subject changing strawman.

You are, as usual, confused.

Nobody is saying they have all of the answers except for the 'thumpers.

Of course, they only really have one answer, but that's besides the point.

As usual, however, they twist logic and suppress intelligence to infer that the inability to answer one question invalidates the entirety of science.

That's stupid beyond belief.

Science depends on those laws.

So?

Without them science would not exist. Evos claim that everything has naturalistic explanations. So explain.

As has been explained - there is a naturalistic explanation, but we don't know it yet.

For that matter, thank you for admitting that the *Who created God* comeback is stupid. We always thought so. You've confirmed it.

Actually it's not a stupid question at all. It's the same as your stupid question, really. It's asked because there isn't an answer and without an answer obviously your whole argument falls apart, right?

[valkyry1]

The evos like to claim they have all the answers, they just dont know them yet.