[Filo]

But since you are not, you have no way to know what I have or haven't seen.

You should learn some of the different uses of the pronoun.

One of your primary errors is in believing that you have not made any.

Cute, but still untrue.

But religion does not hinder scientific advancement?

Reading comprehension isn't one of your strong suits, is it?

Yes, in general, religion definitely hinders scientific advancement.

Sure the church sponsored science at one point, but that time is long gone. . .

Thats tageline material...

It is indeed. Maybe I'll switch someday. . .

Naturalism is known drivel.

But only to folks whose credentials are decidedly sparse.

BTW, you didn't answer my question about Popper.

That's 'cause I don't care. . .

Cheers!

[Fichori]

One of your primary errors is in believing that you have not made any.

“Cute, but still untrue.” [excerpt]

You appear to have placed an almost religious faith in your infallibility.

But religion does not hinder scientific advancement?

“Reading comprehension isn't one of your strong suits, is it?

Yes, in general, religion definitely hinders scientific advancement.

Sure the church sponsored science at one point, but that time is long gone. . . ” [excerpt]

The reason I asked is because there are a number of great scientist who were religious and yet they made great discoveries.

Naturalism is known drivel.

“But only to folks whose credentials are decidedly sparse.” [excerpt]

Popper rejected the naturalistic view.

Are your credentials better than his?

BTW, you didn't answer my question about Popper.

“That's 'cause I don't care. . .” [excerpt]

I noticed that you ignored a few other points I've made, too.