[nanetteclaret]

***There is proof for all naturalistic assertions and none for religious ones. There isn’t even any logic or reason behind the latter.***

Have you ever read “Summa Theologica” by St. Thomas Aquinas?

[Filo]

Have you ever read “Summa Theologica” by St. Thomas Aquinas?

Not in its entirety, no. I've read excerpts and summaries.

It, too, falls under the heading of self-serving "proof" that, like "intelligent design" and most other religion-based proofs, is built with the answer firmly in mind beforehand.

That alone is reason to reject it without consideration.