Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: publius321

William Wallace was hardly “knighted” by the English monarch thus would not have been knwon as “sir” anything. The lairds of the highlands didn’t need such nonsense. They knew who the leaders were. FREEDOM!!!


8 posted on 04/15/2009 8:33:35 AM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the long march

There’s one in every crowd. After the Battle of Sterling Bridge in 1297 Wallace was knighted by an unnamed Earl and became Sir William Wallace “Guardian of the kingdom of Scotland and leader of its army”.

But that is so tangential it is ridiculous. The obvious point was to compare the emotion one might feel after watching a rousing speech to the emotion resulting from a scene in a movie – not the applicability of the word “Sir”. Good Lord.


9 posted on 04/15/2009 9:03:56 AM PDT by publius321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson