Hogwash! She didn't subscribe to his position on ANWR.
she abundantly made clear that she is skeptical of the alleged role man plays and favors in any case oil and gas energy (see the interviews), regardless of “green concerns”.
And you ignore my questions. If she is so skeptical, how does she justify subjecting us to cap-and-trade, international taxation, and trillions in foolish spending? Why support trillions for a "transition to green energy alternatives" "such as wind or tidal power" when more viable alternatives are available? Not once did she use the word nuclear in her statement.
"Alaska’s OCS has received little analysis of its potential to provide renewable energy resources, such as the wind or tidal power. As we transition to green energy alternatives, we cannot afford to foreclose opportunities in our OCS." (Palin, 4/14/09)
BTW it’s rather odd that some are acting surprised here, when it’s consistent with her comments she made during the campaign.
I'm not surprised. I'm just surprised at how many here are willing to completely ignore facts, misrepresent what Sarah has actually said and done in the past, and call freepers "trolls" for telling the truth. Trust me -- that is not a winning strategy for Palin's campaign. Encouraging her to get educated on this subject, ASAP, would be a better use of your time.
You apparently aren’t familiar with the concept of “compromise”. All the points you mention are McCain policy.
She always before, during and after the campaign meanwhile insisted on drilling in ANWR and expanding NON-GREEN energy (oil and gas). It’s her bread and butter. You are trying to make Palin the owner of McCain’s stances.