Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Offset' Crash Tests Fhigher Risk for Smaller Cars
LAT ^ | 04-14-09 | Doug Stewart

Posted on 04/14/2009 5:53:10 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay

There’s an old saying -- you can’t repeal the laws of physics. That may be the discussion right now at several small-car manufacturers today.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, known for its slow-motion car crash videos, sent the Honda Fit crashing into a Honda Accord, the Smart ForTwo into a Mercedes C-Class and a Toyota Yaris into a Toyota Camry -- each at 40 miles per hour. The results indicate what safety you may be trading for efficiency when your mode of transportation shrinks.

The tests are called "offset" crashes. The cars crash not quite head on, similar to what would result when a car strays over the center line, and the damage can easily intrude into the passenger compartment. Each of the small cars sustained damage the institute believes would lead to injuries for their occupants.

In a statement, Adrian Lund, president of the Arlington, Va.-based institute, said: “Minicars as a group do a comparatively poor job of protecting people in crashes, simply because they're smaller and lighter. In collisions with bigger vehicles, the forces acting on the smaller ones are higher."

The Smart ForTwo had “extensive” damage...

...into the area where the driver sits. The institute's findings indicate a human would have a high likelihood of sustaining head and leg injuries. The Yaris rated poor in the area of head and leg injuries as well. A driver of the Fit in a similar accident would have hit the steering wheel through the airbag in addition to sustaining leg injuries.

What say the manufacturers? In a statement, Dave Schembri, president of Smart's U.S. operations, called the test an example of a “rare and extreme” accident. “The Smart ForTwo meets or exceeds all U.S. government crash-test standards," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; cafe; cars; crashtest; nofreakingway; smartfortwo; toyota
If you drove on the streets of Paris or Florence, for example; where road infrastructure is old & narrow (compare to America's back alley ways), then the small car pictured above works. But add "smart for 2" design into the mix of present day vehicles on fed/city/state built for speed roadways in the US and hope one never has an accident. Even a cow on the dusty country road could win out! Perhaps that's rare and extreme.

I guess you could take down the "big car" manufacturers, eliminate all SUV's (American's choice of a family vehicle), build commercial trucking lanes out of the already "expansive muliti-lane" highways, reduce speed limits, raise taxes on gasoline......Ah..Hmmmm...


1 posted on 04/14/2009 5:53:11 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Sorry: Title Crashed while posting:

'Offset' crash tests find higher risk for smaller cars

2 posted on 04/14/2009 5:55:01 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

This is specifically why I drive an F-250 and my wife a 2500 Suburban.


3 posted on 04/14/2009 5:58:01 PM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

To the libs, the answer will be obvious... Ban all the large cars and trucks, and then the smaller cars will come off better in the collisions.


4 posted on 04/14/2009 6:16:57 PM PDT by MikeGranby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1FreeAmerican

Haha! You are pancakes if a semi hits!

Sure, it may be a rare event... maybe even as rare as a same type of collision demostrated in the article, but you’ll be hurting just as badly!

That’s why we all need to drive 70-ton Main Battle Tanks.


5 posted on 04/14/2009 6:21:29 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Gee who would have thought...


6 posted on 04/14/2009 6:26:10 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
Gee who would have thought...
...and you had to study and retain an advanced degree knowledge of physics to know that!
7 posted on 04/14/2009 6:41:39 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
Crash Test Video..April 14, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety found that drivers of 2009 versions of the Smart Fortwo, Honda Fit and Toyota Yaris could face significant leg and head injuries in severe front-end crashes with larger, midsize vehicles.
8 posted on 04/14/2009 7:22:20 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
In collisions with bigger vehicles, the forces acting on the smaller ones are higher.

This after just having said, "You can't repeal the Laws of Physics" ! The forces in a collision are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.

9 posted on 04/14/2009 8:24:30 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson