Yes, Texas is a terror state, which means that Zero will negotiate with us and give us pretty much anything we ask for.
Well YEE HAW to you, Obama and if you don’t like it you can stuff it.
Putting 2 and 2 together.
I was just thinking that. That report describes my church, my neighborhood, my family, my co-workers, everyone at the Ranger’s game, last weeks PTA meeting,...
Marked to read later...
Congratulations Texas!
I just love a good, right wing stronghold.
I’m jealous. I live in Wisconsin. Only Wisconsin and Illinois don’t allow concealed carry. Plus we have ridiculously high taxes. Plus it’s cold here! HHmmm. Might want to talk to my hubby when he gets home tonight and ask him if he wants to move...
If Texas were to decide to secede from the union, I would be very tempted to move there from here in Florida.
TEXAS AKBAR!!!!!!
“According to the Department of Homeland Security, Texas fits the Department’s profile of potential domestic terrorism described in their newly released report titled, ‘Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment’”
Do you think they have a similar report on the left-wing? Probably not. Why? Because, by definition, the left-wing fighhts for greater centralization of government power and the right-wing fights against it. And our federal government is mostly interested in domestic enemies of the federal government.
Insurrectionist BTTT.
It’s time. Let’s do it. Texas must become an independent country once again.
If Texas causes Obama any more trouble, he’s liable to raise the stakes and call them “right wing contingency planners.” Watch out!
Don’t forget the people that cling to guns and religion. We’re ready. Are they in Texas?
(U) Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and
adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups),
and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or
rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a
single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.
So, if I reject Federal authority in favor of state authority and oppose abortion, then by DHS definition I must be a right wing extremist. Later in the document the authors make the distinction between “right wing extremists” and “law abiding citizens”. The distinction seems intent on presupposing that right wing extremist - those who believe states have primacy over the feds and those who oppose abortion - are not law-abiding. I suppose the opposite of being law abiding is to be law breaking, thus a criminal.
A smarmy opinion piece bereft of documented sources, other than a vague reference to a 2007 study in Germany. It also refers to an unnamed “civil rights” organization that is concerned.
A shoddy opinion piece that merits a C- in a 100-level college writing course.
Your tax dollars at work.
Oh Geez....
1) We shouldn't secure our borders or make sure that only legal citizens get jobs, instead we should go after businesses that "exploit" illegals (oh, I mean "undocumented workers").
2) "Show me a 50 foot fence, and I'll show you a 51 foot ladder." (Right, I recommend landmines myself.)
3) Guns are bad..that is unless my agents are the ones who have them.
4) Islamic terrorists aren't a problem, it's those "right wing radicals".
5) The Constitution is a "living document" (meaning that it can be brushed aside when convenient).
Napolitano in particular, and this administration in general, are national embarrassments that should be removed as soon as possible.
GOP 2010!
5th Generation Texan here .... I'll stand with my tribe ... HiTek RedNek ;)