Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SwankyC

How about the jellyfish? It’s highly complex in its feeding mechanism, and highly efficient in motion. Yet it’s method of propulsion is incredibly simple, not complex at all.

Complexity is not required by evolution! A monkey’s tail is considerably more complex than that of the gorilla or human (we both have essentially none - just a few remnant bones), and it serves the needs of the monkey quite well - an animal that is very light.

Likewise a bird’s skeleton. Considerably less dense and complex than a human’s, but that is what allows it to fly.


241 posted on 04/14/2009 6:27:36 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier
I'm not going to argue every mechanism of every organism on this planet to say what's efficient or what isn't.

To say that evolution preferred anything beyond single celled organisms (the required starting point) - that are perfectly efficient over an organism with millions of cells pumping this or that chemical out to regulate the organism or help it eat is such a contradiction that it makes no sense.

242 posted on 04/14/2009 6:37:40 PM PDT by SwankyC (Please stand by - The Patriot Act can and will be used against all of you right wing extremists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson