Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dinosaur herd buried in Noah’s Flood in Inner Mongolia, China
CMI ^ | April 14, 2009 | Tas Walker

Posted on 04/14/2009 8:36:29 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 401-410 next last
To: GodGunsGuts

Coolness! So they will no doubt produce human (or any recent mammal [horse, elephant, whale, dog, cat, &c]) in the same layer to demonstrate the timing?


321 posted on 04/15/2009 7:41:44 PM PDT by Phileleutherus Franciscus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ira_Louvin

PS Why won’t you answer why Evos are so preoccupied with blacks from Africa? I have asked you three or four times now. Why do you keep avoiding the quesiton? Do you have something to hide, or is that you just can’t find the answer on your Temple of Darwin websites?


322 posted on 04/15/2009 7:43:04 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: Phileleutherus Franciscus

You might want to give the following a quick read. And btw, would you become a creationist if human and dino remains were found together?

Dinosaurs, humans and the fossil record

http://creation.com/dinosaurs-humans-and-the-fossil-record


323 posted on 04/15/2009 7:52:46 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
And btw, would you become a creationist if human and dino remains were found together?

There are a very large number of species that, if found together, would falsify evolutionary theory. Humans and dinosaurs is definitely an example.


324 posted on 04/15/2009 7:57:13 PM PDT by Phileleutherus Franciscus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Phileleutherus Franciscus

Does the fact that the Evos have been forced by the evidence to chop down Darwin’s “tree of life” and replace it with a concept similar to the creationist “orchard” or “forest of life” give you pause to doubt the NDToE?


325 posted on 04/15/2009 8:00:48 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

You seemed to have evolved a very good mechanism for avoiding difficult questions.

I was born at night, but it was not last night.

Rewording and turning the question around does not constitute an answer.


326 posted on 04/15/2009 8:00:52 PM PDT by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

What does “NDToE” mean? The fact that a theory is “evolving” doesn’t bother me in the slightest. It doesn’t with gravity, with the atom, with electromagnetism, or with evolution.


327 posted on 04/15/2009 8:08:45 PM PDT by Phileleutherus Franciscus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Ira_Louvin

==I was born at night, but it was not last night.

Your screenname was born on FR but a few weeks ago. Going out of your way to completely change the subject of a thread is thought of as “hijacking” the same.


328 posted on 04/15/2009 8:08:50 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Phileleutherus Franciscus

==What does “NDToE” mean?

It means the neo-Darwinian ToE. But you didn’t quite answer my question. Does the fact that the Evos have been forced to abandon Darwin’s predicted tree of life and embrace an “orchard” or “forest of life”, long predicted by creation scientists, give you pause to doubt the NDToE?


329 posted on 04/15/2009 8:11:18 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
Evolution fails that test and fails it countless billions of times over since every one of the myriad steps required by evolution amounts to such a zero-probability event.

You obviously have no training in biology or probability. But, you do read the false data on the creationist websites!

330 posted on 04/15/2009 8:18:35 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Does the fact that the Evos have been forced to abandon Darwin’s predicted tree of life and embrace an “orchard” or “forest of life”, long predicted by creation scientists, give you pause to doubt the NDToE?

I suggest you re-read the article. The fuzziness in the tree of life is so far down near the roots that it gives no comfort to creationists.
331 posted on 04/15/2009 8:19:26 PM PDT by Phileleutherus Franciscus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Ira_Louvin; GodGunsGuts
Rewording and turning the question around does not constitute an answer.

Typical from him. Don't expect any more.

332 posted on 04/15/2009 8:20:20 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I read it. It actually confirms that human and dinosaur fossils have never been discovered together! Thanks!

“Although human and dinosaur fossils have never been discovered together, this in no way refutes the biblical account.”


333 posted on 04/15/2009 8:22:20 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Yep! the catastrophic death from the flood is the only possible explanation for any of the great fossil beds. - Its just not natural for entire populations, young and old, to die all at once.

What did god do with all the bones of the millions of humans he killed in the flood?

334 posted on 04/15/2009 8:23:58 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
I don’t have time to play 20 questions.

Joke of the week!

335 posted on 04/15/2009 8:24:35 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Exactly, just because they haven’t been found together DOES NOT refute the biblcal account in the least. Thanks for pointing that out!


336 posted on 04/15/2009 8:25:09 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

The same thing he did with all the bones of the animals?
(nothing, except let them be butied)


337 posted on 04/15/2009 8:37:10 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Point taken,

Thanks for the heads up, my friend.


338 posted on 04/15/2009 9:01:13 PM PDT by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Exactly, just because they haven’t been found together DOES NOT refute the biblcal account in the least.

Logic says that if man and dinosaurs walked together before the flood then their bones would both be found together. Of course logic means nothing to you.

339 posted on 04/15/2009 9:33:55 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
What did god do with all the bones of the millions of humans he killed in the flood?

Fertilizer. Same sort of business you appear to be in...

340 posted on 04/16/2009 6:46:01 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 401-410 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson