Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
Well, you might have multiple chances, but if you are further away, you’re possible success is reduced, even when you do have that chance.

Out of 100 shots at a head-sized target from 200-300 meters, I would miss zero (where a miss is anything significantly off the point of aim), and my guess is that the SEAL snipers are better than I am. At 25 meters, I'd again miss zero shots. No difference.

219 posted on 04/14/2009 8:00:37 AM PDT by TurtleUp (Turtle up: cancel optional spending until 2012, and boycott TARP/stimulus companies forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: TurtleUp

It is simply an absolute fact that the chances are improved at closer range than they are at a farther range. It’s so obvious and clear that no one need to even get into statistics and probability — because everyone knows this inherently...

If you don’t know this inherently, I’m afraid you’re “beyond help” for something like a Free Republic board... :-)


222 posted on 04/14/2009 8:03:56 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: TurtleUp
Out of 100 shots at a head-sized target from 200-300 meters, I would miss zero

Even with your platform moving up and down and your targets platform moving up and down-maybe at a different rate than yours?

223 posted on 04/14/2009 8:26:41 AM PDT by tc45a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson