Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bimboeruption

Its not about the high seas. Its about entering ports, and the liability of having armed crewmen.

Many of the countries these ships go to do not allow armed merchant ships. Therefore, they would have to drop off the armed guards miles out, and still be liable to pirate attacks.

AND, you really do not want untrained, armed merchant marines getting all trigger happy on anyone coming near their ship. The insurance companies know that you are less likely to be harmed by pirates if you do not resist, and go the ransom route. It is all in the insurance tables.

I know it sounds really wimpy, but thats the way this thing has evolved. And, believe it or not, injuries to crew members that have been cooperative have been minimal.

I am not saying I wouldn’t want a sidearm if I were these guys, but this is the way its been.


146 posted on 04/12/2009 12:18:11 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ein Volk, Ein Riech, Ein Ein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt
And, believe it or not, injuries to crew members that have been cooperative have been minimal.

That's not likely to continue after this, at least when Americans are captured by Mooselimb pirates.

178 posted on 04/12/2009 12:42:43 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson