[dirtboy]

If it pains you, don't read my posts.

If you can't deal with critical feedback, don't post in the first place. I think bashing Obama without having the facts on-hand is counterproductive.

[rodguy911]

If you don't know enough about ozero to realize that he deserves to be bashed any time and all the time,especially here, then its you that has the problem.

[roses of sharon]

I’m fine....it is you that posted to me....and again...I was only commenting on the diff in the MSM treatment of Bush v Hussein in military victories.

And my plans to do the same.

Seriously...give it up...not everyone has to play by the rules the MSM/DNC have set up for us.

[mojitojoe]

If you can't deal with critical feedback, don't post in the first place. I think bashing Obama without having the facts on-hand is counterproductive.

[STARWISE]

I think bashing Obama without having the facts on-hand is counterproductive.

~~~

We bash because 0’s past affiliations, statements and government actions warrant it ... even in just his actions since 1/20/09; therefore, there is a basis of some knowledge of the proclivities and ideology of the subject official.

Do you disagree with the criteria ?

~~~~~~~~~

This is the kind of leader we’re saddled with now.

###

Obama’s Potemkin Military Reception=No Scandal-..were pre-screened,asked ...“Who voted for Obama?”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2227558/posts

*snip*

According to a sergeant in Iraq :

*****We were pre-screened, asked by officials “Who voted for Obama?”, and then those who raised their hands were shuffled to the front of the receiving line. They even handed out digital cameras and asked them to hold them up. [Via Macsmind.]****

As supporting evidence for the digital-cameras part of the story, the sergeant (or Mac, can’t tell which), suggests that the identical cameras can be verified in the AP photos. Looks right: