Video: MSNBC devotes 13 minutes to “teabagging” puns

HotAir ^

[Dallas59]

MSNBC is full of laughs...

[Tex-Con-Man]

Rachel is the “teabagger”...
Olberman would be the “teabagee”.

(I am making myself uncomfortable, and need to fill out an HR report on myself.)

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

This was a ‘little ditty’ posted on our local NBC forum:

_____________________________________________________

Have fun tea bagging on the 15th!

Here is the online definition in case you were unaware:

1. teabagging
To have a man insert his scrotum into another person’s mouth in the fashion of a teabag into a mug with an up/down (in/out) motion.
Man: Let’s teabag!
Your Daughter: Okay!
by anonymous Nov 6, 2002 share this

2. teabagging
v. To lower one’s scrotum into another’s mouth.
Person 1: I want to try teabagging.
Person 2: You mean, you want ME to try teabagging...
by The Grammar Nazi Dec 19, 2001 share this

3. teabagging
the insertion of one man’s sack into another person’s mouth. Used a practical joke or prank, when performed on someone who is asleep, or as a sexual act.
At the frat house last night, when Tim was wasted an down on the floor, he got teabagged by, like, ten guys!

__________________________________________________________

h t t p://users.boardnation.com/~waff/index.php?board=12;action=display;threadid=6652

[Reaganesque]

I lived in Chile for 18 months during the rule of Augusto Pinochet and I must say, in all honesty, the state run media under that dictatorship had more journalistic integrity than MSNBC has. MSNBC has gone from ignoring news it doesn’t like to actively suppressing it.

[al baby]

No worries we don’t work together

[The_Media_never_lie]

One million liberal, ugly bull dykes.

Ugly bull dykes probably consider Rachael Maddow attractive. This hetero male doesn't.

[chris_bdba]

T-taxed
E-enough
A-already
B-Bible thumpin’
A-Angry
G-Gang hatin’
G-Gospel lovin’
E-Energized against Big Government!
R-Revolutionary

[OpeEdMunkey]

Rachel is the “teabagger”...

Actually I think she's the D-bag.

[Obamageddon]

I think most of the posters here don't understand why bull dyke Maddow thinks "teabagging" is so funny.

Teabagging has a double entendre that probably originates in the sodomite bathhouses of Nancy Pelosi's district of New Gommorrah.Google it if you dare.

Rachel thinks it's hilarious that she can put the label "teabaggers" on tea party attendees. Her degenerate mind can't set the perverse image aside, thus her difficulty in reporting the story with a "straight face"

Of course, Rachel never really reports anything with a straight face, does she.

[TruthHound]

If this is the kind if coverage the MSM is going to give our revolt, we will have no choice than to ramp it up.

So we want our voices heard and organize these peaceful protests — only to be patronized and mocked by our media?!?

If it’s this kind of arrogance or just silence by the MSM, I GUARANTEE they’re going to see some McVay level destruction. God I hope not.

All we’re asking for is responsible reporting by our media.

If saying, “hellooooo...excuse me...” won’t get any attention, a slap in the face should.

This is in no way an advocacy of violence. It IS an ultimatum to be given a voice.

[bilhosty]

I sincerely hope that these antic cuase all of the lib’s to watch MNSBC (no one else will). And then if all of the conservatives and Republican’s would watch Fox then ABCNNBCBS can support themselves on what is left over ( or atleast try to).

[cripplecreek]

This is what happens when you allow 10 year olds to run a network.

[Swing_Thought]

This whole scene depresses me. People are scared about what’s happening to our country and are expressing their frustration with these tea parties. It’s not going to make any difference but what else can we do? It’s not as if Congress has any interest in listening to us and we’re outnumbered at the polls, so it’s not as if we have much hope of replacing our elected representatives with people who would represent our values.

Then, in this environment, along comes this juvenile mouthpiece for the state, mocking folks because they don’t happen to know that “teabagging” is now a porn term.

It’s sad, really. While our rights are being frittered away and some try to stand up to it, fascists like Maddow just laugh while they direct the groupthink against those who are desperately trying to preserve our freedoms.

[Tempest]

MSNBC are an embarressing stain on journalism and are attempting to shame Americans whom oppose a culture of wealth being stripped from the middle class and redistributed in every other direction.

[vg0va3]

Man, I must have missed her show...toooooo!

Cable News Ratings for Friday, April 10
Posted on 13 April 2009 by Robert Seidman

FNC – 1,259,000 viewers

MSNBC –386,000 viewers

P2+ Prime Time
FNC – 2,160,000 viewers

MSNBC –770,000 viewers

Must have been a hoot. Sad everyone else but 386,000 people missed her hilarious show. Her mom must be proud.

[manc]

I decided to flick over to MSNBC as I never watch it now

My word , they are completely bonkers there, I saw two women sitting there this weekend facing each other talking about obama’s puppy like it was a world even which will affect us all for the rest of our lives
Questions asked like how much, what kind of dog but the question what made me laugh was when the MSNBC woman asked the other well what kind of future problems would this dog bring to their family. The way she asked it was like she was asking about how the Taliban would bring in future problems for obama

The segment went on for some time as well and yet they hardly mentioned the hostage crisis or Somalia until today and now they are all talk about it.

Then for 2 mins I switched over again and her this black lady do not know her name say how Michelle Obama brought so much style to the white house and Europe and how she wood everyone.

Gets remote and turns over

That station is a joke, no news what so ever and I am shocked to know if anyone on here watches that crap at all

[AmericanInTokyo]

From "Arugmentation and Debate" --Published 1917 (MacMillan):

THE NATURE OF DEBATE 385 3. Sarcasm and ridicule.Good humor is even more necessary if one is to use sarcasm or ridicule. The line must not be drawn so strictly against these weapons as against personalities pure and simple. Sarcasm in a skillful hand is a formidable weapon, and ridicule can often win a point where nothing else would avail. But it must always be remembered that these are light arms. They are fine- wrought, flexible foils, and they must be wielded with a light hand. They are not suited for the slashing and cutting of broad-sword play. To fence with them a man must be quick, light of hand, and, above all, cool and self-controlled. Some men cannot use sarcasm and ridicule at all, and no man can afford to use them carelessly. Ill temper in the use of these weapons is both careless and clumsy. It always results in a wild aim and looks like foul play. Sarcasm and ridicule are most effective when directed against conceit and affectation. A speaker who allows his conceit to rise to the surface, or who assumes a tone of grandiloquence or bombast, has ex- posed a weak spot in his armor. And there is no weapon that will so readily find the spot and strike through it as one of these light side-arms of forensic combat. The following is one of the best illustrations of the use of ridicule that can be found in American oratory. It is so interesting and so worthy of study with respect to its general tone, its vivid rhetoric, and its telling choice of figures of speech as to justify the giving of the passage nearly in full. A certain General Crary, on February 14, 1840, in the debate in the House on the Cumberland Road Bill, attacked General William Henry Harrison for alleged deficiencies as a military commander, severely criticising his conduct of the battle of Tippecanoe and of various other campaigns. Thomas Corwin of Ohio replied in a speech of which the following is a part. Mr. Crary was so overwhelmed that John Quincy Adams, a few days after, referred to him as "the late Mr. Crary." ...."With respect to all three of the methods mentioned above, viz., personalities, sarcasm, and ridicule, it is to be remarked that they are only occasional weapons. They are not sub- stitutes for proof or for the substance of argument. They are merely auxiliaries. It is often easier to malign or laugh at an opponent than to answer him, but it does not accom- plish the same end...."

This is all bound up in agenda. Their agenda is for the destruction of the USA, not for its fortification nor the protection of the Constitution. Accordingly, you would NEVER see them ridicule the big rallies they had in favor of Open Borders all Illegal Aliens--the pumped it in every best possible light, showing personal "touching" stories of individual illegal aliens to make Americans feel guilt about going after them...there will be no such close up, human interest, personal stories on Wednesday in the liberal American MSM focusing in one person for example, whose backs are literally broken by taxes or have to give up their small businesses or have to work two jobs to make ends meet due to a big gouge out of their salaries; and yet here is another movement (Tea Parties), and they will ignore, and if they cannot ignore, they will ridicule and slander. Their reaction to this Tea Party Rebellion phenomenon itself is so instructive, but not a surprise.

[RedMonqey]

This is a bit late to post but I couldn't resist.

If I had a name like Anna Marie COX,(the Air Amerika TwitMaddox was chatting with) I would tread lightly around the subject of “teabagging”

The old parable aboutpeople who live in glass houses and stones...

[E.C.I.]

Someone needs to do this and then send it to these MSNBC scum:

Take a real teabagging porn picture and photoshop in the faces of Rachel Madow (teabagger)with balls in Keith Olbermann’s (teabaggee’s) mouth.

Isn’t juvenile humor funny ???