Posted on 04/10/2009 9:57:11 PM PDT by Steelfish
Well the enemy are now embolden with a loser in the White House.
Fat boy’s thugs were out in force the other day.
He is going topis away all the results of our success? God, I hope not. I don;’t think the SOB cares, though.
Absolutely.
I find this man to be scary. I hoped that his posturing last year was simple pandering to the nutty left. But he IS the nutty left.
Yes he is the nutty extreme left. He is a socialist, a left wing liberal, and a defeatist. Our nation is going to pay a very heavy price because of his socialism and his defeatism.
Good God, 0bama, you are the leader of the free world, at least ‘act’ like it,
You said — Well the enemy are now embolden with a loser in the White House.
—
Well.., from my list, Obama has a long ways to go before he catches up to Reagan. Now, there was a President that really was “tested” by the enemy...
I don’t think Obama can come anywhere near what Reagan accomplished.
See my list I complied today...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2226437/posts?page=43#43
I don't believe he is a defeatist. A defeatist simply gives up the hope of winning.
I believe that Obama's goal is to lower America's standard of living to that of other countries. He especially wants to lower White Americans' standard of living to that of Black, Sub-Saharan Africans.
It's all about pay-back to him. Pay-back to Whitey for mythical injustices, which never actually happened.
He is a defeatist when dealing with our foreign enemies.
Actually, I think he IS one of our foreign enemies. And he is working WITH our foreign enemies to subjugate the US to either the UN or some other external power.
Again, there is a difference between simply giving up and actively working against a country. The Clintons sold America's nuclear secrets to the Red Chinese Army. That wasn't defeatism. That was active Treason and Espionage. Obama is more of the same - only worse.
—
Your response to what I said:
YOU said: "Well.., from my list, Obama has a long ways to go before he catches up to Reagan. Now, there was a President that really was “tested” by the enemy..."
And YOU followed up with: "I don’t think Obama can come anywhere near what Reagan accomplished."
----
So what saying?
So what are you saying? = So what you saying?
You were asking — So what saying?
—
I take it that you’re asking what I’m saying about that...
I had to laugh at the thought that some people were thinking that this little pirate event was some kind of “test” for Obama. It’s hardly anything at all in the way of “Presidential Crises” actually. But, when I started compiling the list of other Presidents and their “crises” — then it became apparent that Obama couldn’t call this little event a “crisis” of any sort.
It would be like comparing a “paper cut” to some guy in the war having his leg and arm blown off... no comparison at all. And it was *especially so* once you see how much Reagan was tested. In fact, I’m flabbergasted at what Reagan had to go through. It’s almost unbelievable...
Anyway, what I’m saying is that this is no test for Obama. He might as well be on vacation, as anything else. You could let the military run on “auto-pilot” and do as much... LOL...
—
Well, an interesting thing happened on the way to Free Republic for me, a few days ago..., it just started with a simple post and two little items on it... I never intended for the following list to come about... LOL...
Here’s where it all started, and then some FReepers started giving me some more events.. :-)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2226437/posts?page=5#5
THEN... it turned into this...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2226437/posts?page=135#135
—
Oh..., and I decided to watch the docudrama — “The Missiles of October”. One should watch that one (or watch it again, if you have already seen it) to see how a “real crisis” happened and all the backroom scenes of how the President’s office works in solving the crisis... :-)
For a second there, you give the readers, following my comment, that Obama’s perceived weakness by the enemy of the United States is the same way they perceived Reagan willingness to use military force. I don’t think the bad guys of the world tested Reagan to see if he would use military might. Reagan made that clear before he ever became president. ... Oh, maybe one that idiot Daffy Duck(Kadafi) from Libya thought he could.
I’m just referring to the often stated item brought up about “being tested”... and I’m just saying that I can’t even call this a “test” for Obama... I mean, he could “sleep-walk” through it and put the military on “auto-pilot” and be successful... LOL..
But, talk about “tests”... well see Reagan’s “tests” and what he had to go through. I don’t think Obama will ever see anywhere near that kind of “testing” that Reagan saw...
Obama is going to be tested by every potential enemy imaginable because of his weakness.
China wants to take Taiwan, now’s the time. Will Obama send the Pacific fleet to repulse the invasion?
Russia. Does Putin and his puppet want to take advantage of Obama? How about retaking the former territories of Soviet Union? Watch what happens to Georgia.
Iran. Obama won’t lift a finger to stop them from getting nuclear weapons. Ahmadinejad reads him like I do. Obama will fold like a cheap shirt and let him have his nukes.
Al Qaeda in Iraq. They are stepping up their attacks since Obama became president. Would Obama pull out of Iraq like he has planed and let it fall? Al Qaeda thinks so.
North Korea. They now have the green light to develop nukes and their delivery systems without interference.
Oh, Obama will be tested like no president ever has.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.