What does the governor’s security issues have to do with a father’s right to see his child? Hint: nothing at all. The father has a right to see his child and the security concerns of a 3rd party (the grandparent) has very little to do with preventing him from seeing his baby.
And if the father’s mother is a risk because she was arrested for drugs, is the grandfather’s sister a risk since she was arrested this past week for breaking and entering?
Or does that risk only apply to the father’s side of the family?
If the “kid” needs security, wouldn’t it be wise for both parents to stay out of the media, or does that only apply to the father, and not the the mother’s interview with Greta Van Sustern on Fox, or the mother’s responses reported by Entertainment Tonight?
Um, I think there is quite a bit of difference between a thief and a drug addict when it comes to a baby's safety. I'd prefer not to leave my baby with a criminal at all. But murderers, rapists, drug addicts and dealers are definitely out. Alcoholics are also out.