— Japan is a very homogeneous society. They have a very low crime rate.
— The United Kingdom used to be a homogeneous society and used to have a very low crime rate. As immigration has increased this has changed and the UK now has a very heterogeneous population and a high crime rate.
— Nation states in Africa that consist a heterogeneous mix of various tribal groups thrown together in a single nation only by lines on a map have high crime rates.
— Latin American societies with a high degree of class polarization lack cohesion and have high crime rates.
— The US has always been a heterogeneous society and has always had a fairly high crime rate - except during the period between the early 1940s and early 1960s, following the immigration restrictions imposed in about 1920 and which allowed the US to assimilate much of our ethnic population and become more homogeneous. Following the loosening of immigration restrictions the crime rate climbed. In recent years a disproportionate amount of the crime in the US has been perpetrated by recent immigrants, especially illegal immigrants who are by definition alienated from and have no vested interest in our society.
Heterogeneous societies tend to be highly polarized. Homogeneous societies, less polarized. Polls show that the Obama administration is the most polarizing government the US has had since such poles have been taken. I see a direct correlation between Obama’s polarization of our society and the sudden rise in “mad warrior” type shootings.
What government must do to prevent these incidents is eliminate the polarization and make the US a more homogeneous society:
— End the class warfare rhetoric.
— End race entitlement.
— Promote racial and cultural assimilation.
— Stop threatening the religious traditions of the society.
— And above all, place greater restrictions on immigration.
No, I don’t think Mr. Obama sees it as being in his best interest to do any of this.
Yep. Nailed it.