[mbraynard]

You know, Aspergers can be treated. Would you like me to mail you some pamphlets?

No, everyone here did support some kind of immigration reform because everyone here is unhappy with the status quo. I think you need the pamplets to explain that 'everyone' used in this sense is not literal. I guess some miserable SOB will say they like the status quo just to make the point that it's not literally 'everyone.'

But it is literally correct that everyone running did have a plan for immigration reform. They were all different. Yet, Romney's and Tancredos were the best of the bunch.

You are the one making the false assumption - that immigration reform necessarily means 'comprehensive' - IE - path to citizenship/amnesty. Tanks didn't and Romney's didn't.

[calcowgirl]

No, everyone here did support some kind of immigration reform because everyone here is unhappy with the status quo.

I'll say it again, in case you didn't notice the first time I posted it (to you).

I do not, and did not, support any kind of "immigration reform," and I was not/am not alone on FR in having this opinion.

"Immigration reform" as uttered by Congress, implies that there is a need to change the law or to add new laws.

Being "unhappy with the status quo" does NOT equate to needing new laws. Government currently has the authority and the duty to enforce the law. They are only lacking the will to do so. New laws will not change that -- only kicking the dufuses out of office will.

P.S. Your personal attacks on Synro (e.g. "Aspergers can be treated") are disgusting.

[Syncro]

You are a pompus ass and are no better than Obama with his Special Olympics comment and the leftists that made fun of Sarah Palin’s youngest child.

I'll get back to you later to comment on your false statements, liberal spin, complete lack of manners/social graces and inability to have a reasoned discussion vis-à-vis your childish personal attacks degrading people with disabilities who are not perfect like you.