Posted on 04/08/2009 9:21:19 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
You were stringing me along, ansel12.
I respectfuly asked you to respect my wishes and to not discuss religion, and you would not honor that.
Intead, you were playing games instead of just telling me your views from the start.
I speak as a Catholic because I am a Catholic.
Go tell someone such as Glenn Beck that they’re not Christian.
I'm not Catholic, you are.
You're the one who believes that's not so, so you tell Glenn Beck he's not a Christian. In fact, he even discussed this on one of his radio shows.
Call him during his show on Monday and tell him that he's not a Christian. I'll be listening.
This is that raw, blatant, dishonesty that people keep confronting you with, your Catholic faith and your popes are the ones that declare Mormons as non Christian.
You keep denying your faith and Pope John II.
Go play games with others, not me.
That was a totally CRUEL and UNWARRANTED statement.
Classless.
Sorry, I just caught it (after you pointed it out).
The word denying was meant in regards to your Catholic faith and your Popes teachings on Christianity and Mormonism, specifically "are Mormons Christians".
You do deny your Catholic faith and your Pope when it comes between them and Mitt Romney.
What is your indignation over again?
Won’t you join the Catholic church on this issue, or at the very least say that you respect their teachings on it and the official decision of Pope John II even though you personally are in rebellion against them on this question of Christianity?
When it comes to Romney you will even mock Pope John II and the Catholic church itself in your determination to deny your church on this issue.
You as an announced Catholic are being addressed repeatedly about the Pope and the Catholic faith and you post silly pictures.
Fair enough.
I voted for Romney in the primary (not that it has anything to do with the discussion.)
There are more than "two problems" here, none caused by what you posted, IMO.
The problem as I see it is that you continue to not be responsive to what people post, instead imposing your own words and biases on others and misrepresenting their opinions or questions. Take your post, for example. You seem to be responding to post #222 by sickoflibs, but you don't bother to ping him or to address anything he wrote (and this is about the third time I have seen you do this). You continue on with all sorts of unsupported assertions (addressed to the anonymous "you") that do not resemble what was posted ("You are reading and quoting... ", "You never... ", "The problem is you can't read... ", "if you continued along your line... ", "And I'll tell you another thing..." etc).
If you want to have a discussion, you need to start by actually reading and absorbing what the poster is saying, not just launch a tirade against the anonymous "YOU," attributing things to your perceived antagonist that they did not say nor believe.
JMHO
I am not anonymous here any more than you are.
And hundreds of FR posters fit that category also.
So get over yourself being all alone so brave to use your "real name" if that is what you are inferring.
So you are backing out of your offer to post your bone fides huh?
Figures, I'm not going to waste my time searching what you have or have not done, the ball's in your court.
Put up or stifle your braggadocios bloviating. It's a game you have already lost, so I don't expect you to keep your word.
Plus it is just as stupid and narcissistic as pulling the sign on date card.
I'm pinging the people you ping, I believe most of them would like to see if you follow through to show how much more involved in republican and conservative issues you are and have been than anyone else on this thread.
"Follow through" being the key phrase, I doubt anyone is interested in hearing you brag any more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.