Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
Yes, led by China because its regime has most to lose if domestic situation deteriorates badly. It is not just about money. The trouble there could lead to regime change and whole other problems.

It is foolish to expect China to become consumers of the world, while the rest of the world start saving and rebuild their balance sheet. Both Chinese regime and Chinese people in general are now going to survival mode. You won't expect much increased consumption from them.

This is rather an elementary fact, but it was none the less lost among movers and shakers of world business.

6 posted on 04/08/2009 9:26:54 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster
"This is rather an elementary fact, but it was none the less lost among movers and shakers of world business. "

Yup...I agree.

It wasn't that long ago though that some were saying that internal consumption would rise and make up for lost exports. WRONG!

7 posted on 04/08/2009 9:31:01 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson