Posted on 04/08/2009 5:09:03 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
Hurricane flags up!!!
I have felt all along that Michelle and Bambi don't really have a true marriage and maybe that explains why she does not wear a ring, although Barack does. I think their marriage is sorta like the one Bill and Hillary had. One of convenience. I think there is some arrangement to stay together for his political reasons and what that brings to Michelle and the girls. Namely fame and money.
I have seen them in her wedding picture, but that is the only time I have seen them.
I agree with you- we hate it when DUHmmies talk about someone’s looks
There are so many important issues other than Michelle Obama’s looks, and it makes us seem petty and cheap (like democraps)
Right-o, but those 2 little girls are just adorable.
“makes us seem petty and cheap “
like Michelle’s lashes?
I would think the British would have more important things to worry about than the American first lady’s eye lashes... but then we super-scrutinized Princess Di
It would have been a riot if one of those false eyelashes had fallen off at some photo op in Europe!
What is that old saying....You can’t make a silk purse out of a old sows ear.
No matter how much she tries, she has only so much to work with.
I was born and raised in the Burgh also...live in a burb east of dahntahn now...but would love to move away. Hubby has other ideas...so here we are.
I agree about the marriage of convenience part; I always remember that the Bamster was ‘assigned’ to Shelli at the law firm (Siddell, et al.)
Laura Bush (but I have already admitted I am shallow) had a gorgeous set. Huge solitaire (not that I notice....)
yes *wink*
Too funny—Killer gonna get you :)
The one with mama Sidney? I will have to get a closer look. I have always found the family wedding portrait to be quite fascinating with the body language displayed by both Michelle and Barrack towards his mom.
sw
I don't critize her face, her figure, or body. She can't help how she is shaped. So, criticizing that, I agree, is cheap and I didn't do it even about Hillary. But what Michelle selects as clothing to wear for important events and when meeting heads of state is significant especially when her clothing is wrinkled, tight, grossly overstated, or way too casual. Her attire and appearance should reflect a level of taste, decorum, dignity, and should make our country proud. Michelle does none of that, as previous First Ladies did. She dresses horribly! That is why she is deserving of the criticism she gets here and everywhere except the drooling media in America.
Imagine if Laura Bush dressed as Michelle had, false lashes and all. We would not have been pleased and would have critized her. And the world would have done the same. A First Lady's appearance is always a subject. Michelle's attire is her attempt at an "in your face America" statement to show that she will do it HER way, and not as etiquette or protocol dictates.
He he he
OK, now you have me interested. Any good pictures showing off Laura’s rock?
OK, now you have me interested. Any good pictures showing off Laura’s rock?
Or human...
That is a very disturbing painting!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.