Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LurkedLongEnough; HoosierHawk; RJL; rockinqsranch; paltz; ZirconEncrustedTweezers; OldPossum; ...

Ping to a Republican-American Editorial.

If you want on or off this list, let me know.


2 posted on 04/08/2009 7:28:58 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Graybeard58; LurkedLongEnough; HoosierHawk; RJL; rockinqsranch; paltz; ZirconEncrustedTweezers; ...
What Newt forgot to tell you is that what we are lurching toward is Corporate Statism, ala 1920's Mussolini, with state ownership and of course, control in varying degree, of private enterprise. Instead of a Fascist, One-Party Parliament, we will have a Two-Party Congress that is immune to outside interference, to rubber-stamp statist measures.
The illusion of free speech and hard-fought elections will thus be preserved, which Benito, and his demonic National Socialist follower Adolf, were never able to achieve.

Conservative districts may well get a "Conservative Party," going, and even slip in a candidate or two. But conservatives will never get in on the RINO-DEMO incumbent action, i.e., never be able to bring home the bacon to their constituents (as Crook Murtha and Senile KKK Krook Byrd consistently do, which gets them re-elected). Neither will they be present in sufficient number to even slow down the statist juggernaut.

The inherent weakness in Conservatism is that it requires economically stable, politically literate, and somewhat sophisticated voters. This political commodity, upon which good government of a republic depends, is in ever-diminishing supply. As present senior generations die off, and the new Latino demographic component approaches 100 million, the republic as you know it will change into something else over the rest of this century.

That's the "Change" BHO, Jr. is talking about. "Constitution," you say? Hmmm?

14 posted on 04/08/2009 8:04:20 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (The Election of 2008: Given the choice between stupid and evil, the stupid chose evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

Thanks for the ping Graybeard.

Seems to me the Socialist/Democrats are stacking the deck with strategic moves intended to thwart the electoral process in America for many an election cycle to come.

Their arrogance and disrespect for the First Law of our land, the Constitution allows them to proceed without remorse.

Their arrogance and disrespect for the people of this land allows them to proceed without remorse.

Their legislations are dictates, and their rhetoric is condescension. There is no negotiating with tyranny.

There is the possibility they will cause their own “Let them eat cake” moment in history. For every action there is a reaction. Perhaps we shall see.

The longer they remain in power, time goes by, memories fade, and the survivalist in humanity becomes the focus. Whatever we do for ourselves today is what will be there for posterity.

We have to regard this moment in American history with the urgency the situation requires, and we must be extremely correct in what we do.

There are costs involved.

I sincerely believe the costs are too high to persue the course towards a third party.


43 posted on 04/08/2009 10:32:54 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson