Posted on 04/06/2009 4:21:03 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
"If Mr. Obama fights revealing his documentation, there is growing concern of civil unrest, or worse, being unleashed in the streets of our nation. The economic crisis coupled with this type of a constitutional crisis could prove to be a flashpoint that would test conventional law enforcement and elements of homeland security."
So the FBI would prefer that Obama's LIES, FRAUD, DISTORTIONS, MANIPULATIONS and DECEPTIONS about his background remain a secret for the sake of "crisis prevention?"
Hey FBI! Go play in traffic, you worthless POS organization!
I thought crescendos happened when the noise peaked? I haven't heard much of anything about this on ABCCBSNBCCNNMSNBC.... When Crissy Mathews is howling for Obama to step down, then, I'll start to panic...
Wow! This sort of describes the $4 trillion dollar deficit these folks have just foisted on the American Public. Maybe they should send those 80,000 troops to Washington and surround it until the birth certificate shows up????
If even a Wiccan dude is that unimpressed,you might want to take a second look at who is doing what to whom....and why.
I agree. Hard to see an insurrection in a bunch of citizens demanding that the supreme law of the land be followed!
This number can't be right. Heck, I own that many myself!!!
Wiccan dude also has a bone to pick with the guy, who wrote a very negative book about satanism.
I’d have to see a copy or the source for this document before I got too excited.
“600,000 armed government agents. 60,000,000 gun owners.”
So to rephrase that old Door’s song : “We’ve got the guns AND we’ve got the numbers.”
I was just listening to some early 70’s songs. Lots of those protest songs have lyrics that fit the situation once again.
hmmmm...thanks for the ping. Read through all the posts and it looks like some noobies are trying to discredit it. Don’t have time to research it tonight, but what’s the verdict on the source for this report?
It all sounds perfectly plausible to me. There is a growing unease in this country about Obama and it could spiral out of control. The interesting thing is that Obama himself could put all of this to bed by proving once and for all that he is eligible. He apparently doesn’t care if this country erupts into violence and chaos. As a matter of fact, it might be just what he is hoping for to bring his ‘change’ through hopelessness. I found the article at Orley’s site by Pam Gellor(Atlas Shrugs)very good and a must read for every FReeper.
If FBI is so concerned, then someone produce obozo’s legitimate birth certificate. If not then remove him from office. He’s done enough damage to the country.
Actually, for the POTUS, there never has been a formal background investigation. That’s because is was always informally handled by the respective Parties at the urging of Congress.
The only “official” policy I find on Security Clearances in Gov’t, which include employees, are E.O.’s 12958 (Clinton 1995) and 13292 (Bush 2003)
However, these E.O.’s both refer to the Security Policy Board, which Bush abolished in Feb of 2001, which is referred to as National Security Presidential Directive 1.
For members of Congress and their staff...
Atomic energy “Restricted Data” (42 U.S.C. 2162-2168) and “intelligence sources and methods” (50 U.S.C. 403(d)(3)) —
is specified in statute and subsequent rules issued, respectively, by the Department of Energy and Director of National Intelligence.
Other controlled information — such as “sensitive security”
and “sensitive but unclassified” information — is determined largely by executive directives.
Basically, the POTUS establishes a need for a requirement of a National Security Clearance, and delegates to the National Security Board (NSA) to determine the level and the prerequisites.
Congress is actually charged with regulating, by on the record inference, the suitability of the POTUS.
Amen!
Apparently, Robert Mueller thinks alot of Infraguard. Video link here:
http://www.infragard.net/media/director_flash.php?mn=1&sm=1-1
As good a place as any to start.
Actual security quidelines (google "security clearance adjudication guidelines") are set by Presidential Directive.
If you think for a second, there's a very good reason that POTUS and members of congress are NOT required to have security clearances, especial now that DumbO is POTUS.
Since the DSS reports to DOD and the adjudication process itself has so many subjective variables, any POTUS could potentially order DSS to disallow a clearance to any Republican Presidential Candidate any time he wanted to.
Here's a link to the white paper written by Dr. Lyle J. Rapacki.
The statement of purpose in the document clearly indicates that the document is intended to stimulate discussion. Had the FBI requested such a white paper, the document would reference such a request. It appears that Dr. Rapacki references his membership in the FBI InfraGard as a way to associate the FBI with the document, therefore making it sound more official.
At the present time, I am unable to confirm his membership in InfraGard, but will get back to you with more information as soon as I have it.
To answer you question, yes. It appears Dr. Rapacki wrote the document and submitted it to the FBI as an InfraGard member hoping it would gain some attention within the FBI.
DSS has nothing to do with POTUS clearance requirements. POTUS is not under DOD.
REPOST:
Actually I’ve been researching this for two months. For the POTUS, there never has been a formal background investigation. That’s because is was always informally handled by the respective Parties at the urging of Congress.
The only “official” policy I find on Security Clearances in Gov’t, which include employees, are E.O.’s 12958 (Clinton 1995) and 13292 (Bush 2003)
However, these E.O.’s both refer to the Security Policy Board, which Bush abolished in Feb of 2001, which is referred to as National Security Presidential Directive 1.
For members of Congress and their staff...
Atomic energy “Restricted Data” (42 U.S.C. 2162-2168) and “intelligence sources and methods” (50 U.S.C. 403(d)(3)) —
is specified in statute and subsequent rules issued, respectively, by the Department of Energy and Director of National Intelligence.
Other controlled information — such as “sensitive security”
and “sensitive but unclassified” information — is determined largely by executive directives.
Basically, the POTUS establishes a need for a requirement of a National Security Clearance, and delegates to the National Security Board (NSA) to determine the level and the prerequisites.
Congress is actually charged with regulating, by on the record inference, the suitability of the POTUS.
Well, it looks like you found what you had asked someone else for!
Thanks for passing along the info to me as well. Appreciate it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.