[ejonesie22]

LOL..

Right...

Try looking up the definition of Non Sequitur...

Also your post 25 was a hoot.

There was a time your were selling Mitt as the aspects” you now seem to want to acknowledge to bolter your “it's the anti Mormons fault” argument...

[ejonesie22]

That should be:

There was a time you were selling Mitt as the conservative second coming, what are these new “liberal aspects” you now seem to want to acknowledge to bolster you “it's the anti Mormon's fault” argument...

Smart phones and freeping are a pain...

[LoneRangerMassachusetts]

Try looking up the definition of Non Sequitur...

...

There was a time your were selling Mitt as the aspects” you now seem to want to acknowledge to bolter your “it's the anti Mormons fault” argument...

I think I can figure out non sequitur. Can you break down the rest of what you wrote in standard English?