Replies

Instead you are engaged in the classic rhetorical overreach of the reductio ad Hitler, "like Hitler, a lover of dogs..." In case nobody noticed, the whole point of Godwin is that this *always* happens when one side loses an argument.

The point of Godwin's Law was that people would get into arguments over anything and invoke Hitler and the Nazis, and that was silly. For example, two people might be arguing about whether there should be a leash law for pets, or whether movie theaters should offer both Coke AND Pepsi, and one of the idiots would say, "Well, if you like corporations to have that much control over people, then you're no different from the Nazis. If you think dogs, who were born to be free in the wild, should have to wear chokers, you are no different than Hitler with the Jews."

When you are discussing a situation where there actually are parallels to pre-Nazi Germany, such as Obama wanting a national security force as powerful as the military at his disposal, and Obama firing corporate CEOs, assuming complete control of the company, it would be asinine NOT to note the similarity.

Your attitude reminds me of the "zero-tolerance" policies that so many small-minded bureaucrats engage in, where 10 year old children are suspended from school for drawing a picture of a gun or bringing Tylenol. Such people lack the ability to discern when certain reactions are appropriate, and when they are not, so they engage in the same reaction every time. You have decided that it is ALWAYS tinfoil conspiracy theory to notice any ominous parallels with Nazis, so you'll use that same reaction even when there really ARE parallels.

Anyone who thinks that the head of GM losing his job because his company is bankrupt is whtat the problem was with the Nazis is engaged in "like Hitler, a lover of dogs" idiocy. There isn't a parallel, it is rhetorical overreach and stupid. The head of GM deserved to be fired, it would be nicer if his idiot complacent shareholders fired him, but his largest creditor will do in a pinch. Who cares? A better conservative point would be that the UAW is the party that wrecked the industry, not that Obama is Hitler because he didn't let Wagonner stay and waste another $100 billion or so.