Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Diego District Attorney says LA DA's memo on open carry is wrong!
The Examiner.com ^ | April 6, 2009 | Mike Stollenwerk

Posted on 04/05/2009 10:11:35 PM PDT by majstoll

examiner.com — Last December the Los Angeles District Attorney issued an erroneous legal opinion stating that police officers could detain persons openly carrying guns in order to run serial numbers of guns . . .The SD DA is correct! Folks open carrying handguns in California have every bit as much right to privacy and freedom to movement as cell phone carriers.

See more and DIGG at http://www.examiner.com/x-2782-DC-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m4d6-San-Diego-District-Attorney-says-LA-DAs-memo-on-open-carry-is-wrong

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; dumanis; opencarry
News column poitns out how some city attorneys can get the law right, even re guns.
1 posted on 04/05/2009 10:11:35 PM PDT by majstoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: majstoll

The SD DA is correct

We have a great District Attorney in San Diego.
Bonnie Dumanis a Republican is tough on crime
and takes no bull.
San Diego is the second largest DA Office in California and the sixth largest in the United States


2 posted on 04/05/2009 10:27:37 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Kalifornia has open carry?

Who’d a thunk it.


3 posted on 04/05/2009 11:50:43 PM PDT by RebelTex (Freedom is everyone's right, and everyone's responsibility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex
Most states do. States that restrict open carry are as follows:

No open carry unless on the way to hunting grounds or under circumstances that constitute self defense:

NY
IL
SC
FL
AR
OK
TX


Yes, Texas of all places, limits open carry. California is actually less restrictive, counting as a Rural Open Carry state:

http://opencarry.org/opencarry.html
4 posted on 04/06/2009 12:48:33 AM PDT by arderkrag (Liberty Walking (www.geocities.com/arderkrag))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
The SD DA is correct We have a great District Attorney in San Diego. Bonnie Dumanis a Republican is tough on crime and takes no bull. San Diego is the second largest DA Office in California and the sixth largest in the United States

Follow the links, SCP. The opinion (PDF) was written by the Deputy DA, Robert Amador, not Bonnie Dumanis.

Dumanis is a gun-grabbing, union-backed, lesbian activist. She put an "R" next to her name to get elected and claimed she would support the 2nd Amendment, yet doesn't. I hope she gets ousted in 2010.

Feinstein has put her on her "bipartisan Judicial Advisory Committee" so she can say that she has "Republican" participation in making recommendations to Obama.

DA responds on handgun ban , SDU-T January 19, 2008

Regarding “District attorney wants D.C. handgun ban upheld” (Around Our Region, Jan. 14):

The story reported that “District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis announced Friday she is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold a ban on handguns in Washington, D.C.” That report was misleading.

I joined with 17 other DAs across the country in urging the high court to uphold the existing laws against the illegal use and possession of guns in that jurisdiction. Many jurisdictions, including our own, prohibit a convicted felon from owning a gun. For the record, the issue here is public safety. In joining with the other DAs from across the nation, I am trying to ensure that law enforcement can continue to do its job. This is not a challenge to the Second Amendment, of which I am a strong supporter.

BONNIE M. DUMANIS
District Attorney
San Diego

Uh huh -- sure, Bonnie. Public safety. Why don't we just ban all guns so "law enforcement can do its job"?
5 posted on 04/06/2009 2:28:04 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: majstoll; RebelTex; arderkrag; calcowgirl
My question is simple in this matter. When was PC 12031 invalidated?

12031. (a) (1) A person is guilty of carrying a loaded firearm when he or she carries a loaded firearm on his or her person or in a vehicle while in any public place or on any public street in an incorporated city or in any public place or on any public street in a prohibited area of unincorporated territory.

To my knowledge if someone is walking around with a loaded firearm or is stopped with one in the vehicle he will get arested under this section.

6 posted on 04/06/2009 3:31:35 AM PDT by Enterprise (I went to America and all I got were some DVDs and little helicopters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Simple. When you are in a not prohibited place of unincorporated territory. That basically says you can’t carry inside city limits.


7 posted on 04/06/2009 4:17:31 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

I understood Indiana to have restriction on open carry as well...easy ‘shall issue’ ccw though...


8 posted on 04/06/2009 5:05:18 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 ("JesusChrist 08"...Trust in the Lord......=...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

also what difference does it really make when leo can detain me with no justification whatsoever ???

realistically, 'Papers please comrade' has been law of the land my whole life, just repackaged a bit for window dressing...

9 posted on 04/06/2009 5:11:31 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 ("JesusChrist 08"...Trust in the Lord......=...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

Thanks for the info. I need to get out and about more. I knew that Texas doesn’t allow open carry - I just assumed that would be the case in most other states, especially Kalifornia.


10 posted on 04/06/2009 7:07:24 AM PDT by RebelTex (Freedom is everyone's right, and everyone's responsibility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

Thanks for the link. I went there and joined.


11 posted on 04/06/2009 7:23:38 AM PDT by CholeraJoe ("Their armor is weak at the neck and under the arms!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
says LA DA's memo on open carry is wrong!, Enterprise wrote: My question is simple in this matter. When was PC 12031 invalidated? 12031. (a) (1) A person is guilty of carrying a loaded firearm when he or she carries a loaded firearm on his or her person or in a vehicle while in any public place or on any public street in an incorporated city or in any public place or on any public street in a prohibited area of unincorporated territory. To my knowledge if someone is walking around with a loaded firearm or is stopped with one in the vehicle he will get arested under this section.

The open carry in CA is for UNLOADED weapons only. If it is loaded, you are correct, it is illegal. However, California residents are trying to set a precedent and overturn the law that disallows loaded open carry(and it depends on what county you are in, the population density in CA decides what counties can carry openly and loaded.

The whole fracas about open carry of handguns has been about the people who have been carrying openly, unloaded, in compliance with the law but have been stopped, searched and detained in direct violation of the constitution.

12 posted on 04/06/2009 9:02:23 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Thanks. That explanation makes the issue of the article a little more clear.


13 posted on 04/06/2009 9:08:35 AM PDT by Enterprise (I went to America and all I got were some DVDs and little helicopters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

In cities and portions of unincorp. areas where shooting is banned by county, the guns must remain unloaded (mag on belt OK).


14 posted on 04/06/2009 10:01:58 AM PDT by majstoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

open carry in california means an UNLOADED gun. that is the open carry law, open carry (not conceled) AND unloaded.


15 posted on 04/06/2009 10:37:18 AM PDT by dhm914
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dhm914

That’s basically what a CHP officer told me about a year ago. I asked him how one takes a pistol to a range and he said to keep the pistol in open view but have the ammunition locked in the trunk or the back of the pickup where it was not readily accessible to the driver.


16 posted on 04/06/2009 4:10:43 PM PDT by Enterprise (I went to America and all I got were some DVDs and little helicopters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson